this post was submitted on 18 May 2024
10 points (91.7% liked)

Political Memes

10032 readers
1882 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] player2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

In 2016, the blue team won by 3 million votes and still lost the election. The system is broken. I'll still vote blue, but I don't think it will matter, especially since I'm not in a swing state.

The Electoral College Explained

[–] errer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Matters for your more local elections. Those swing states still send a lot of republicans to Congress every election. And control of Congress is pretty damn important.

[–] blazera@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hmmm, today i will attack any attempts to run a better candidate against trump

[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The US system doesn’t work that way. You have a choice between two people. A vote for a third party is a vote not counted.

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You're so engrossed in talking over the other person that you failed to read what they said.

They said "Run a better candidate against" Trump which IS possible to do by the DNC.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not in this election, it's far too late

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The convention absolutely can select a different candidate.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I love that you lot complain that it's not REAL democracy because the DNC is so sneaky behind the scenes, and then in the same breath demand that the DNC undemocratically appoint someone as their candidate who appeals to you and your fellows, voters be damned.

And you wonder why everyone thinks of you as fascists.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

It's the duty of the party to nominate an electable candidate is it not? They had a farce of a primary this year, so the only hope left is a hail mary out of the convention.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It’s the duty of the party to nominate an electable candidate is it not?

Oh, so now you DON'T care about democracy in the party. How convenient, how your ideals change depending on which allows you to scream "BOTH SIDES" the loudest.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Democracy in the party flew the coop when we didn't have a real primary this year. Having a single candidate is not democracy. It's a rubber stamp oligarchy.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Democracy in the party flew the coop when we didn’t have a real primary this year.

Just like democracy was destroyed in 2012 when there wasn't a real primary for Obama. I guess we've just been drifting in a sea of fascism ever since.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It certainly wasn't a good thing.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why wasn't democracy destroyed then? C'mon, show a little consistency! Go ahead, it's not like anyone is falling for the "Very Concerned And Democratic Voter" at this point. It's quite clear that you don't give a single good goddamn about democracy except insofar as it allows you to undermine anyone who isn't a fascist. Like how you decried the DNC for not being democratic enough and then immediately pivoted to claiming the DNC should disregard the voters entirely.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

I never said democracy as a whole was destroyed. I said the party is looking for people to rubber stamp it's oligarchs. If you want to be dismissive that's fine but at least keep up.

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

OP does not know what a tankie is.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

An authoritarian self-proclaimed 'leftist' who loudly decries anything that's not 100% in-line with their desires as 'shitlib' policy that must be opposed even at the cost of ushering in actual fascism. This actual fascism is also often described by tankies as 'not that bad' or 'the exact same' as the 'shitlib' policies they oppose. Dissenters are inevitably reactionaries who must be (often literally) crushed, as they don't reflect the TRUE will of the people (ie whatever the opinion of the tankie is).

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And then they ask "wHy dO tHe dEms mOvE tO tHe CenTrE wHeN tHeY lOsE i dOn'T uNdErsTanD".

[–] OptiMoose@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 years ago

SURELY the DNC will listen if they don't vote, don't run, and don't donate, but post a genocide Joe meme from their phone also made available by genocide while wearing clothes manufactured by a genocidal state on land acquired from an ethnic cleansing. That's the morally upstanding thing to do.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh wow now they're Trump supporters and Communists? LMAO

This is getting ridiculous.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You're absolutely right, it IS ridiculous how many supposedly left-leaning people are willing and even eager to see a Trump presidency to 'get one over on the shitlibs'.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Reductive. Neoliberalism protects and foments fascism as we ratchet a little further to the right each election cycle.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Even if we assume for the sake of the argument that your ridiculous assertion is true, "Let's do fascism faster" is exactly the kind of bootlicking take I would expect from a tankie.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Never said I was a tankie bruh. A party that bases itself on a slightly more gentle fascism isn't the cart we should be attaching ourselves to.

It will never ever be the right election for y'all liberal centrists who shit post on left folks. It is always the next one. Point is, if we want to be rid of this fucking fascist shit, we have to build solidarity with the left.

[–] Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Not interested in the whole yelling at each other thing, so genuinely asking here. What exactly does not voting democrat get the left in the US? Is the OP's assumption that you want to accelerate fascism actually correct?

So far I haven't seen any reason other than either accelerationism or "because it makes me feel bad" and I refuse to believe that's all that's behind it.

I'm really having a hard time, and I genuinely think it's important to try to understand the points of view and beliefs of those we disagree with, rather than immediately turning to infighting.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Political parties exist in the free market just like corporations. If they can't earn votes a new party will form. It's happened before and it will happen again. That's why they message with fear. It's effective at turning off any critical thinking.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Political parties exist in the free market just like corporations.

Tell me more about the political free market under Project 2025.

In fact, tell me more about how quickly firms rise and fall in the free market. It's instantaneous, right?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sometimes it is. Sometimes you have to push it off the cliff.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Sometimes it is.

lmao

[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Shifts the policies of the Democratic party so that they appeal to leftists. Not going to get into an ongoing debate, but just so you can't say you haven't seen any other reasons (which sounds fake to me but okay).

[–] Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I appreciate it. I'm not here to debate you and I have no reason to lie about not having seen anything else, though I'm honestly a bit hurt that you think that, but I guess you've been nothing but attacked so far so perhaps it's understandable.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Could you give exactly one example of that ever happening?

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Hey, remember when we all protest voted in 2016 and drove the Dem party SO far left?

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Never said I was a tankie bruh.

Didn't realize that I wasn't allowed to point out tankie behavior like "Faster fascism Good, Actually" unless the poster self-identified, thank you for the information.

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Idealism is fun, but it's so very extremely privileged.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Idealism is great when you use it to fight for a better world.

Idealism is privileged when you use it to deny any reduction in harm as not being 'good enough' to permit.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

Idealism is privileged when you use it to deny any reduction in harm as not being 'good enough' to permit.

It’s happens all the time when people argue against veganism saying that farming kills the animals in the field despite the fact that meat requires much more crop land to produce.