this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
166 points (93.7% liked)

Games

43965 readers
1255 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Currently, only GOG and Itch are still selling this game.

EDIT: It seems the game has returned to Humble Bundle.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kraiden@piefed.social 52 points 1 week ago (11 children)

content that appears, in our judgment, to depict sexual conduct involving a minor

I'm assuming they don't mean a suggestive camera pan, but actually something problematic on screen, in which case, I totally support the ban. Devs were given the opportunity to change it, and they said no. Ban away imho. The fact that this is considered controversial is pretty disturbing to me.

[–] markz@suppo.fi 88 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

It was a child doing pony play, riding a naked adult man-horse. The dev claimed it was not sexual.

This was removed later but it's the build you send for review that gets reviewed. Other stores got a later version, hence why it passed on those.

Dev was not given a chance to remove it as it turns out steam has a policy that anything that resembles CSAM gets denied permanently.

[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I haven't heard about the details, what's your source on that?

As far as I recall, the developer said he didn't know the actual reason for the ban.

[–] markz@suppo.fi 30 points 1 week ago

Some previous article which contained valve's response, and a description of the scene. I didn't find it immediately, but I'll check again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dukemirage@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] markz@suppo.fi 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Child Sexual Abuse Material. Legalese for child porn and adjacent things.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I also was wondering why, it's always been called CP and then recently they changed acronym 🤷

[–] TrippaSnippa@aussie.zone 32 points 1 week ago

Calling it "porn" makes it sound more legitimate and less like the heinous abuse that it really is.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Like the other user said, porn implies some level of consent which children cannot give. Calling it csam ensures there's no confusion about it being abuse.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Suburbanl3g3nd@lemmings.world 8 points 1 week ago

Pretty sure it's child sexual abuse material

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I'm almost thru the game and I did not notice any sexual conducts with minors

EDIT: Btw. Something that I thought was only done for screenshots, but the nudity in-game is censored/pixelated.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 50 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Steam was the first major storefront to refuse to carry Horses, a first-person psychological horror adventure about "the burden of familial trauma and puritan values, the dynamics of totalitarian power, and the ethics of personal responsibility" set on a ranch where nude human beings in horse masks are treated as livestock.

Publisher Santa Ragione said in November that Valve declined to carry Horses because it contained "content that appears, in our judgment, to depict sexual conduct involving a minor." Santa Ragione disputed that characterization, but an appeal was rejected and the ban stands.

Seems like it's treading a very fine line...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Based solely off the trailer I can see how a big American storefront would err on the side of caution here. There is very little to gain from carrying a game decidedly built with controversy in mind, but a lot to loose.

With the publicity around it and sales still possible through alternative stores maybe things will turn out alright for the developer in the end. "Banned" media is always in demand, after all.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Unless it unexpectedly sells gangbusters, the dev says they're likely to shut down as not having the massive steam audience to sell to won't net them enough to continue. And people are stupidly loyal to valve for some reason.

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 31 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That's because Valve is privately owned and this has largely resisted the enshittification that largely plagues public companies and private equity frims.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] markz@suppo.fi 21 points 1 week ago (6 children)

It very well could be true, but the dev also seemed full of shit in the first interview I saw, pretending that he had no clue why it was banned.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

They'd be as well carrying on. Its in a pretty unique position as being a game that people are talking about before its even finished, which is pretty uncommon for most titles, and can be "the game they tried to ban" which did wonders for Manhunt, GTA and Postal.

[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Valve is pretty upfront about being a business first and foremost. Their customers are loyal because they consistently provide high value at reasonable prices, even though they are in a dominating position in the market. They've taken unpopular decisions in the past, but never any that seriously alienated a meaningful chunk of their customer base.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HollowNaught@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Wait, I thought this game was a depiction of what we subject horses to, using a horror lens to drive home the point? I've never heard of something less sexy?

[–] Contramuffin@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (27 children)

My understanding is that there was a scene where a young girl rides a naked man/woman around. Apparently it has since been changed to make the child older, but... I can perfectly understand why anyone would be hesitant to accept such a game based on that description alone. Even if it's not intended to be sexual, the developers were certainly pushing the line

load more comments (27 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Assuming the content is merely controversial and not objectionable (i.e. exploitative), it seems there may be room for an art-centric game store front.

Ironically, I'm betting it's nowhere near as exploitative as the monetization practices of virtually every AAA release these days.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Is it actually any good? I don't really play horror, but it mostly just looks odd in the trailer.

[–] hexx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Making the matter even more frustrating is the fact that Horses is apparently quite good—or at least, it accomplishes what it sets out to do. The content is decidedly uncomfortable but reviews and reactions on social media are largely positive

Horses is not low-effort, throwaway trash, but rather a game that genuinely seeks to provoke consideration and conversations.

From the article.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] KaChilde@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The game company seems to have thought that they could drum up sales on other platforms by making this a media thing. Based on the additional platforms pulling out, it might have backfired. They could have let their little horse-porn game quietly release on every platform but Steam and made enough to get by. Instead they drew attention to themselves.

[–] GreyCat@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Good on you for dismissing years of work from a group of people as a "little horse-porn game".

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Did it not work tho? This was my first itch.io purchase ever

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Sounds like the gaming equivalent of the play "Equus".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equus_(play)

I can see why some would shy away from it, but banning it is the sort of thing that will keep gaming from becoming a unique art form. 😟

[–] dukemirage@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

It already is a unique art form. This is not defined by the commercial availability, and this game wouldn’t be the first art piece that understands controversy as part of its essence.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›