this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
1220 points (99.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

27838 readers
906 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (9 children)

How the fuck can it not recover the files?

Fun fact, files don't just get instantly nuked when you delete them, those areas are just marked with a deleted flag and only when you start adding new files it gets overwritten.

That why some people send a bunch of 0s to their partition to completely wipe it.

https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/636677/filling-my-hard-drive-with-zeros

[–] fruitcantfly@programming.dev 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

How the fuck can it not recover the files?

Undeleting files typically requires low-level access to the drive containing the deleted files.
Do you really want to give an AI, the same one that just wiped your files, that kind of access to your data?

[–] Fluke@feddit.uk 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Then 1s, then a pattern of 1s and 0s, then the inverse of that pattern, then another pattern, for a number of cycles.

Data can actually be recovered beyond multiple overwrites, if enough time and money is thrown at it.

[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago

If there is something on your disk that a state actor is going to use magnetic microscopy to try to recover, it seems absurd to worry about still being able to use that hard drive and not just crush/melt it to be sure.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I wonder how big the crossover is between people that let AI run commands for them, and people that don't have a single reliable backup system in place. Probably pretty large.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yarr@feddit.nl 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Did I give you permission to delete my D:\ drive?"

Hmm... the answer here is probably YES. I doubt whatever agent he used defaulted to the ability to run all commands unsupervised.

He either approved a command that looked harmless but nuked D:\ OR he whitelisted the agent to run rmdir one day, and that whitelist remained until now.

There's a good reason why people that choose to run agents with the ability to run commands at least try to sandbox it to limit the blast radius.

This guy let an LLM raw dog his CMD.EXE and now he's sad that it made a mistake (as LLMs will do).

Next time, don't point the gun at your foot and complain when it gets blown off.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 13 points 1 week ago

"I am deeply deeply sorry"

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago
[–] embed_me@programming.dev 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Carighan@piefed.world 13 points 1 week ago

No, it was an AI. They're not real, despite people always acting like they are.

[–] m33@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let's unplug this AI from your computer then ... "I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›