this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
305 points (99.4% liked)

politics

26475 readers
1418 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

GOP lawmakers are growing increasingly concerned over signs the 2026 midterm elections could be a wipeout for Republicans that could cost them control of the House and shave down their Senate majority by two or three seats.

There’s growing anxiety in the Senate and House GOP conferences that Trump’s sinking approval rating will create a headwind in swing states and districts.

But GOP lawmakers say they still have time to improve their party’s image before next November.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] moakley@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

and shave down their Senate majority by two or three seats.

That's not a wipeout then.

[–] GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

I remember when they were alarmed over a 2024 election wipeout.

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Who will protect the pedophiles if they lose? I mean, the democrats won’t actually do anything. But the GOP won’t have the power to protect them.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not alarmed enough to actually enact policies that are popular with the majority of the people.

[–] Tilgare@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That's one thing you DON'T have to worry about them learning here.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

IF the Democrats get a huge win, like in the 70%or something, I'm sure they'll squander it like there is no tomorrow. They VOULD impeach trump a dozen times over but they'll start just threatening with letters or some shit.

The US Democrats are the worst political group world wide, only surpassed by US Republicans who are just plain evil clowns

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The choices have devolved to “fascists” or fucking do-nothing idiots at this point.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Team Fascists and Team "actually the Fascists are right, we need more money for ICE, more wall, and the most lethal military ever"

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 100 points 3 days ago (6 children)

I have zero confidence the republican voter base won't just push the big red button right into full blown authoritarian fascism.

Maybe they won't. Im just not confident. They're very easy to manipulate a few weeks out before election time.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 44 points 3 days ago (2 children)

"Well I don't like fascism but ThE LiBrUlZ"

Most will still vote red. Maybe a large chunk just won't vote and that's the best we can expect.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 33 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I saw a post where a disappointed MAGA called out Trump and then said he wouldn't vote in the next election.

That's the way he saw it; vote for the GOP or don't vote at all.

[–] asRomeBurns1979@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I mean if you’re a pro-gun, pro-life, capitalist evangelical who wants less immigration - not voting is the best we can hope for.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 9 points 3 days ago

Fair point.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

They absolutely will still vote red, but hopefully they’ve pissed off enough independents and nonvoters to persuade them to go vote.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 13 points 3 days ago

Politics loves our short term memory. They just need the right timing of some media story or crisis and people forget everything before.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

For all their histrionics about personal freedoms (only for themselves of course), a big chunk of Republicans are just looking for daddy to take care of them. Life is easier when you don't to make decisions and you have zero responsibility for your own mistakes. That felony conviction is no problem because daddy will forgive (and pardon) you.

Add to that the fact that nothing gets Republicans more aroused than taking freedoms away from people they don't like and making them suffer, and authoritarianism seems ideal. Trump and his ilk are perfect reflections of their sadistic MAGA base.

A significant majority of the GQP base and has already chosen full blown authoritarian fascism.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 30 points 2 days ago (8 children)

I would like BOTH parties to go extinct. The Democratic leadership has no spine and waffles at best, the Republicans are evil by default.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago

Replacing the Dems' leadership might actually help. The Republican Party, though, is rotten to the core.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 43 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (18 children)

The US system is so horrendously and completely biased towards the GOP, I don't think polls mean much. Most of the country can not want a Republican and they'll still be "fairly" elected.

I know we're talking about midterms, but this is especially true of the Electoral College, where states with lower populations end up with higher representation per capita. Empty land doesn't vote, but it does change elections in favor of the GOP.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

A Republican I spoke to was fully convinced that living in a state with more land per capita should make each person's vote worth more, while those living in a densely populated state should expect their votes to be worth less. He thought it was perfectly reasonable for someone moving from California to Wyoming to have the value of their vote increase by almost 4x. He balked when asked if the value of a Wyoming vote should decrease by 75% when the voter moved to California.

I can only imagine the impassioned whining if the situation were reversed and biased for liberals.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

There is no way you can lay off 300,000+ federal workers, shut the entire federal government down for 40 days, dramatically increase prices by imposing tariffs, shut down food and other exports by pissing off the buying countries, and allow huge increases in heathcare insurance premiums without causing a recession or worse. Trump and his ilk know it too which is why any economic data they do release will be altered by Trump loyalists, facts be damned.

[–] No_Ones_Slick_Like_Gaston@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I want to believe, but he won in 2024 after increasing the US debt 25%, having excess death of Covid of 1MM and basin his whole agenda on dunking on the poor, where most of us are still. Morons voted him in.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Even Maga notice it when food prices go way up, when they lose health insurance, and when they lose their jobs. We'll eventually reach a tipping point where the sadistic pleasure Maga morons gets from hurting others isn't worth the pain they're experiencing themselves. I hope its soon.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They will blame it on Democrats because that's what their media bubble tells them to do.

I have been hammering my MAGA parents with articles that I know they could never defend in a face to face discussion so that they cannot say they didn't know, and they know exactly why all of this happened.

Still not exactly optimistic that it'll work.

[–] Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago

They believe the other option would have resulted in even worse outcome. As long as they can imagine it being worse, they can believe voting for their (misguided, but not as much as the other) team is the right thing to do.

The silver lining is that if their team is less inspirational, some voters will become discouraged and stay home instead of voting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Democratic donors be like: "we can run anyone and they can't say no!"

[–] KelvarCherry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 days ago

That's why we NEED progressives in the primaries. The real battles will be in that race. If establishment Democrats keep control, Republicans will sweep again from 2028 or 2032; just like what happened after Trump's first term.

I hate that we have fight the Democrats to keep the Democrats alive, but we do.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Guillotine for president 2026!

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 3 days ago

A ‘wipeout’, they would still control two of three, but it’s going to be disastrous!

We need more than ‘shave down their lead’

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago

After a certain point, gerrymanders are counterpruductive. It'll be nice if the other electoral fuckery such as voter-roll purges and voter suppression aren't enough to stop it. But I'm not optimistic.

[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 16 points 3 days ago

Can't wait to see how the Democrats either fuck this up entirely or just fail to do anything productive with the gains.

[–] Foni@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 days ago

The last time Republicans played with tariffs, it took them about a decade to regain power and about three decades to regain the initiative in the debate. Unless they break democracy and invalidate the results somehow, I think that's where we're headed.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

Not if Schumer and Jeffries have anything to say about it...

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

All I have to say to them is:

G-G-G-G-GET FUCKED-ucked-ucked-ucked-ucked-ucked

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I'm not hoping for it .... America has a habit of being dumb as a brick and electing people that eat crayons.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

No worries there are only establishment Democrats and the "progressives" are actively working against the "vote them out" mantra adopted after the last elections.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

Democrats better not mess this up and we do mean it this time. Prison for every single traitor, pedofile and seditious oligarch. Musk and Thiel better be first in line. We want their assets frozen and used to repair the damage to our democracy. The Supreme Court better get cleaned up with impeachments. This is their last chance before guillotine second amendment time. Also anyone who takes money from Israel should now be declared an enemy combatant

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Democrats better not mess this up and we do mean it this time.

Is that a joke? Of course they'll fuck it up.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›