Doesn't sound familiar at all, nuh-uh!

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Doesn't sound familiar at all, nuh-uh!

It feels like part of that is suppressed kinks. Who comes up with such bdsm scenario?
I think the article is correct to mention "A former staffer for Rep. Jeff Van Drew". I mean, it's possible she acted independently, but equally possible she got encouraged somehow.
Yet another perfectly normal and rational MAGAt. I simply cannot understand why anyone thinks their collective are unfit to lead... 🙄
I know that, decades ago, mental asylums were a pretty shitty place to be. But I think the right solution would have been to make them better, not just get rid of them and let them breed. I also know a lot of very normal/stable people got trapped in there.
I don’t disagree with improving mental health care, but holy shit does the line “let them breed” make me uncomfortable. In an ideal world, they could get support to the level which is needed and could live fulfilling lives which may or may not involve children. In this world, I still don’t want to sterilize anyone just because of their mental health (I’d extend that more broadly, but I could see the case for voluntary chemical castration in response to some limited number of crimes).
I don’t know if that’s actually what you meant or if you meant it more like “let the problem get worse,” though.
It should. This is straight up eugenics. No one should be making genetic fitness a priority when proposing state policy.
No one said sterilization. It’s difficult to have babies in an asylum… without major red flags.
I don’t know what word to use, So I’m just going to use the word crazy. I understand this is not the word people prefer to use. Have you seen how crazy people are in the United States? I don’t mean just over the top, I mean screaming and yelling in the street, shooting up schools, the list goes on. All of that behavior can be identified. And these days, I think maybe it would have been best if we locked everyone like that up, and did not allow them to fuck.
I wonder if Fox is gonna talk about this 24/7 for the next two years like they did Jussie Smollette