this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2025
40 points (79.4% liked)

Technology

76945 readers
3328 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MysticKetchup@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

So the guy that spent half a year taking away lifesaving aid from starving people now says money is no big deal? Then why spend so much time cutting welfare programs?

That's not even starting on the fact that current AI and robots are nowhere near the full automation level for the vast majority of necessary work.

[–] yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 hours ago

Listening to this is as useful as listening a random person yap about the conspiracy theories they believe in. There is no new useful information to be gained. Only there's a difference. When it's a random person, at the worst case, they talk about them to try to convince you of said theories, for their own pleasure of convincing themselves that they are right. When it's a billionaire like this one, at the worst case, they try to persuade everyone and their mother that what they are saying is, not just reasonable, but the absolute truth, and their PR team probably came up with it as a way to make people as likely as possible to hold billionaires accountable for the horrible shit they do. Which means that, in that supposed worst case, which would, mind you, be the most effective way for the billionaire to keep doing business as usual without interruptions, what the billionaire is saying is just a diversion tactic.

TLDR: Please stop focusing so much on what the billionaire says. They probably don't really believe in what they're saying. Please focus instead in the billionaire's actions, because that's what they probably don't want you to do.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 hours ago

So we are getting that UBI, right? Right?

👀

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago

This grifter is still saying shit and people are still believing it? Doomed fascist culture.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 7 hours ago

He's gotta get a trillion dollars no matter what, but believe him when he said it will totally be irrelevant.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 23 points 12 hours ago

But somehow his money will still be extremely relevant.

The billionaires are not going to save us from the billionaires. If we get AGI they absolutely won't roll it out to the masses, they'll keep it a secret and just use it within their own businesses.

[–] mech@feddit.org 16 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

only for the billionaires who own the AI though.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 13 hours ago

hes probably trying to get that 1trillion just to prop up his XAI company, it must losing tons of money from operating datacenters.

[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago

Will even Elons money be irrelevant?

[–] HarmlessCake@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

So communism? I assume the richest man in the world has no interest in the money going worthless. Only talk promising impossible things to leave the AI bubble alive

[–] mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Oh, no, no, feudalism. With the present techbro billionaires as the new aristocracy. Money will be useless because the serfs can’t afford anything anyway and work will be optional yes, you always have the option to starve.

[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 74 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Nobody with all the money is going to willingly make money irrelevant, unless they can preserve their power in some other fashion.

[–] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

They hoard bullets, water, guzzolene, and mother's milk

[–] Zier@fedia.io 6 points 14 hours ago

elon is a junkie.

[–] skvlp@lemmy.wtf 50 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

If that is true, then why demand obscene payment packages?

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 16 points 22 hours ago

But, but, it's worth nothing!!

[–] LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe 50 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

It's possible, but not with jackasses like Elon in charge.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 6 points 16 hours ago

It's not possible because the people who have the power to make that happen would never let it happen. I don't care who they are.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 10 points 22 hours ago

"Societal and technological advancements need to go hand in hand"

  • Kelly from The Orville

I think computers are a good [current] example of when tech got ahead of society. Especially the Internet but moreso the ability to make complex systems that don't require as much direct human interaction.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 15 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, take the delusional nazi drug addict's word for it!

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 12 hours ago

He makes Nazis look bad.

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 29 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

“It’s much harder to grow vegetables in your backyard, but some people still do it because they like growing vegetables,” Musk added.

The world’s richest man, ladies and gentlemen.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Having a backyard or any space to grow plants is a privilege many don't have, besides the fact that vegetables don't like extreme climates

Then just do it in your greenhouse. If you don't have one, ask your help to build one.

[–] pyria@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 22 hours ago

That is so right up there with some of the scummiest things CEOs have ever said.

The Heinz CEO tells us to "get used to it" about inflation.

And then Nestle over there, saying about how water is not a human right.

These rich fuckheads totally operate on a different world than our own.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 15 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Says man trying to set a new record for person with the most of it...

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure he already is the richest man on the planet

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 minutes ago

He wants to be the first trillionaire. Current richest person is a much less lasting title. He was bumped from that position briefly by the Oracle guy like a month ago.

[–] verdi@feddit.org 17 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Elon Musk is a fucking idiot.

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Yeah, where’s this headline?

[–] Quazatron@lemmy.world 20 points 22 hours ago

Excellent. I'll text you my IBAN so you can transfer me some of your irrelevant money.

[–] Foni@lemmy.zip 14 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

This guy was going to put a man on Mars by 2015 and make the hyperloop the next big thing; with the latter, he prevented investment in trains in the USA. After hearing this, I can only recommend that you join a union; you're going to need it.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 13 hours ago

the hyperloop was twofold, it delayed californias fast rail long enough for trump and ELAINE chao to block the funding.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 13 points 22 hours ago

That's only because money is already irrelevant to him.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

People have been talking about "post scarcity" since forever.

Yes, in the far distant future people will be able to have things they need and not have to work. AI will also exist in that future.

However, I don't think anyone believes that future will arrive in the next decade.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The future is already here. It's just unevenly distributed.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 2 points 22 hours ago

"The Future is Now!"

also:

"We went too far."

[–] pyria@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 22 hours ago

The issue is that, UBI is a contested subject. It is the answer to what's happening with automation.

And nobody is touching it but lets continue giving these few people all the money in the world and little leftover for everyone to fight over.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 22 hours ago

If money is going to be irrelevant, then he should give his all away right now. Get ahead of that curve.

[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

We need a New New Deal to get anywhere near that. First we're going to experience mass unemployment for about a year. Then after people have been severely pissed off with no opportunities for a couple months, then things will actually start changing.

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

The last guy we want promoting good things. He will curse them with his waxy Elder Things notions.

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 4 points 22 hours ago

What a dumbass.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 22 hours ago
[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

He probably means for anyone with at least 100 million in wealth. Everyone else just doesn't matter to him.

[–] Modest_Toxic@feddit.uk 3 points 22 hours ago

Pure genius from the almighty himself! I'll quit my job now while I'm ahead (not on my mortgage). /s