this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2025
411 points (97.0% liked)

memes

18070 readers
2595 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This meme was brought to you by rounding errors

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago

This meme was brought to you around two weeks ago.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

3.14.1 will be perfection.

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

It'll be maintained for a while, so we might get to 3.14.15 or 3.14.16, which will be a better approximation and better because of more bugfixes.

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

3.14.2. Do you even math?

Or, as mentioned already, 3.14.16 or 3.14.159, etc.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I prefer floor().

I thought .15, but I can't say I've even seen that many revisions at that level normally. I knew someone would round up in a comment after a posted. lol

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

To each their own, but floor() sacrifices precision and we’re deep into Nerdville here.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

It's three fiddy.

And the cowards still didn't implement Pi as a constant out of the box!

Still gotta do

import math

math.pi

Like someone who's got time to type like 17 extra characters 😤

Wouldn't this be a π²-thon?

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

Python π.none

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

TranscriptionA picture of a man with safety goggles on carefully looking into a test tube of green liquid. The liquid is labelled:

Python 3.14.0

Release Date: Oct. 7, 2025

And the picture is captioned:

Finally

π-thon

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Your spoiler text got messed up there since the last ":::" is treated as being still within the quote block. You might need an extra newline above it for separation. I hope this helps rather than being pedantic & annoying?

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Interesting. What client are you using? It displays fine for me in lemmy-ui (the default Lemmy web app).

I hope this helps rather than being pedantic & annoying?

Absolutely it does! Unfortunately Lemmy and Piefed clients are...inconsistent, at best, when it comes to how some of the finer points of syntax get parsed. Spoiler text is among the worst contenders, because of how non-standard the syntax is (second-worst contender: superscript & subscript). I'll try adding in the newlines and hopefully it won't cause any extra problems, but I can't guarantee it'll help.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes interesting indeed! I am using PieFed's standard browser UI, in Firefox on Android, which I had thought they had standardized to match Lemmy's spoiler handling but apparently we found a niche case where they differ.

Your edited text now renders perfectly for me, so yes that seems to have been the source of the discrepancy. Agreed that particularly the apps render all sorts of things willy-nilly, though I suppose it is good to have choices! (And yet I prefer the web browser that actually works on PieFed to an app that currently would miss so many features, which the API is still being expanded to be able to handle).

Thank you for your continual kindness and consideration in commenting:-).

Hi! Can you confirm for me whether this method renders right for you?

Test:
This is the test

[–] thenextguy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’ll wait for 6.28, thanks.

[–] manucode@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

A disciple of Tau, I see

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 0 points 1 day ago

Not sure what I'm going to do. I always skip one version and now I'm 3.13.