this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
868 points (98.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

27389 readers
1886 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 115 points 1 day ago

DNS: Do Not Serve

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org 50 points 1 day ago (4 children)

lol whats this basaka.top website can't resolve

[–] Elting@piefed.social 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Ghoelian@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago

It is now

As soon as the dns changes have propagated anyway

[–] YoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earth 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Apparently malware, according to uBlock

[–] entwine@programming.dev 30 points 1 day ago

Wayback machine has captures from 2021 and it just looks like an abandoned WordPress site... So yeah, probably malware.

Wtf are you doing OP?

Doesn't even register in WHOIS searches anymore for me. Apparently Namecheap will sell it to you for $2.98.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Well, it's certainly an interesting method of self-promotion to those that bother caring enough to read that part. If it is a malware host, then those reading that far are also probably more conscious of the possibility of it being such so I'm not sure how effective it'd actually be.

Of course you being the one pointing it out could be considered sus...

🤪

[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

Lol I figured it was porn that would make even Cloudflare blush

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

there are .top websites and they aren't for dating?

[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago

If I remember correctly, .top is just one of those dirt cheap TLDs that you can use for whatever.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This makes me curious, was there actually a cloudflare error page with the error on the cloudflare cloud? I'm used to seeing the one where the error is on the host. But, for an error where the error shows as being on cloudflare, cloudflare's systems would have to be working enough to serve the error page where they show that their cloud is the issue, but broken enough to not be able to serve the cached content.

[–] Tlf@feddit.org 3 points 19 hours ago

In case anyone is interested in the full story: https://blog.cloudflare.com/18-november-2025-outage/

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 19 hours ago

I remember a similar screen, though with the elements beside each other rather than on top of each other because I was on desktop. So yes, Cloudflare's error messages are actually accurate in that regard.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Mine said the issue was Cloudflare this morning, similar to the picture.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Interesting, good job cloudflare for at least being able to serve the correct error message.

[–] lividweasel@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The part that I got a kick out of was that their status page was also throwing out the error. I guess it was still indicating the status in a way…

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nice, what was the "Host" in that case? www.cloudflare.com?

cloudflarestatus.com, seems to be hosted on AWS. Probably just got hammered because there was suddenly a lot of people caring about CFs status.