this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
250 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26404 readers
2290 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Trump administration has released the names of 607 people detained by immigration agents, and whose arrests might have violated a court order, and only 16 – or 2.6% – of them have been identified by the federal government as a "high public safety risk" because of their alleged criminal histories, according to court documents.

Eric Balliet, a retired special agent with Homeland Security Investigations, worked for the department until last year after 25 years on the job, said the data regarding the ICE arrests erodes trust in the federal immigration crackdown in the Chicago area, in particular the Trump administration's repeated claims that they are targeting the "worst of the worst."

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DeltronZero@lemmy.ca 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That’s because this has nothing to do with public safety. Quite the opposite in fact. This is about terrorizing communities one city at a time. They want people living in fear regardless of their criminal record or immigration status.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

They want to meet some arbitrary quota that has been set by morons. And have to get done by whatever means needed.

And they want to get that sweet sweet "bounty" bonus money.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 15 points 2 days ago

but they brown

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They'll spin this as having caught 600 criminals that they didn't even know were guilty of crimes......yet.

[–] lando55@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

They'll probably doctor the minority reports

[–] manxu@piefed.social 5 points 2 days ago

I think there might have been a misconception here. When they say they are targeting the worst of the worst, they don't mean the people they want to deport, but the people they are trying to hire into ICE.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Would entering the country knowingly in an illegal fashion be considered a criminal act? Assuming that crime is still considered a... crime.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, seeking refuge is not a crime. Under international law, the US has obligations to provide asylum

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Are the majority of those in the center from a war torn area? I'm not heartless but I dont think completely unregulated immigration is a positive. Which feels like what is being pushed as an alternative.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The majority of the world's economy is wrecked, leading to organized crime, states of emergency, and military occupation. This is especially an issue in much of America, and it's a consequence of US foreign policy.

The immigration to the US is what Juan Gondolas called the Harvest of Empire. You reap what you sew.

The solution is equity, better foreign policy, and an end to capitalism. Until that happens, there will always be refugees coming from the exploited countries to the wealthy countries responsible for the exploitation.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago

Oh yeah, you and I have a completely different idea of how the world works.

[–] Blade9732@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yes, entry into the US at a place other than a designated place and time, misrepresentation or concealment of facts is a misdemeanor crime under US code. Simply being in the US illegally is a civil violation and specifically not a crime, the remedy is deportation. Around 50% of people in the US illegally did not cross the board illegally.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Also worth noting that you need to be on US soil in order to apply for asylum. It’s common for migrants to cross the border without permission and immediately turn themselves in, because it’s the only reliable way to initiate an asylum review.

If they are later granted asylum, would you still consider that illegal?

[–] Blade9732@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

You are correct that this is a legal means of entry. This falls under a designated portion of US code. An asylum seeker must turn themselves immediately in to border enforcement. They are then processed and released into the country, pending a hearing. People with this status are not "illegals", despite what this administration is trying to say. They are grabbing US citizens, legal status asylum seekers, legal residents with misdemeanors(like driving offences), and a very small percentage of actual criminals that need to be deported.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So, if they are here illegally, what's the argument against deportation? If they are in the process of earning citizenship, sure why not let them. But, like you said 50% came here legally. Of that 50% how many working to legitimately earn citizenship?

[–] Blade9732@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The US immigration system is a complete joke. You can not get legal status or have a path to citizenship if you entered illegally. People who had Visa's revoked or stayed past expiration have to leave the country voluntarily, then re apply after a set amount of time, typically 10 years. If you re enter illegally after deportation, it is 20 years.

Edit: I forgot to answer your first question. There is no argument against deportation. Most reasonable people would, and have, argued that the immigration system needs overhauled to allow people to work towards citizenship or legal status. It is and has always been a clusterfuck of paperwork and arcane rules. The main argument is how you deport people. Here are several examples: ICE raids a Georgia/ South Korea venture billion dollar solar panel factory. They show up with dressed as para military, full swat gear and arrest 300 South Koreans at the plant. Handcuff and parade the workers out to detention, then deported. The workers legally entered the country with B1 business Visas. They are not here to take an American job, but to set up equipment and train the US workers in the new venture that is slated to open next year. The Trump administration argues that they should have had H1b Visa's instead and made a big show of a raid. The detention conditions are also terrible. Not one of these workers will ever come back to the US, and we may have stifled foreign investment in the future. The simple solution is to contact the Korean corporate office and convert everyone to a different Visa. Many other companies have used B1 in the past, and if they want to change interpretation, so be it, but to go about it like a raid on a terrorist cell is ridiculous.

Example 2: ICE raids a South Chicago apartment building in the middle of the night. They repelled from Blackhawks, had drones and used 300 federal agents dressed as paramilitary soldiers. They kicked in doors and used flashbangs and tear gas. All residents of the 130 unit building were detained, including children, outdoors and with little to no clothes. In the end, they arrested 37 illegals, of which no one has found a criminal record for. No one has been charged for any crime. Multiple Venezuelans were deported out of the 37, for a civil offense (not criminal).

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago

Sounds reasonable tbh.