this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
42 points (100.0% liked)

Global News

5202 readers
535 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Dhaka (AFP) – A Bangladesh court sentenced ousted prime minister Sheikh Hasina to be hanged for crimes against humanity on Monday, with cheers breaking out in the packed court as the judge read out the verdict.

Hasina, 78, defied court orders that she return from India to attend her trial about whether she ordered a deadly crackdown against a student-led uprising last year that eventually ousted her.

The highly anticipated ruling, which was broadcast live on national television, came less than three months before the first polls in the South Asian country of 170 million people since her overthrow in August 2024.

"All the... elements constituting crimes against humanity have been fulfilled," judge Golam Mortuza Mozumder read to the court in Dhaka.

The former leader was found guilty on three counts: incitement, order to kill, and inaction to prevent the atrocities, the judge said.

"We have decided to inflict her with only one sentence -- that is, sentence of death."

Crowds waved the national flag and celebrated on the streets of the capital.

Former interior minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal was also sentenced to death in absentia after being found guilty on four counts of crimes against humanity.

Ex-police chief Chowdhury Abdullah Al-Mamun, who was in court and had pleaded guilty, was sentenced to five years' imprisonment.


Hasina, who was assigned a state-appointed lawyer for the trial, called the verdict "biased and politically motivated" in a statement issued from hiding in India.

"Its guilty verdict against me was a foregone conclusion," Hasina said.

She can appeal against her sentence -- if she is arrested or surrenders, her defence lawyer Md Amir Hossain said.

Shamsi Ara Zaman, whose photojournalist son Tahir Zaman Priyo was killed during last year's protests, said she was "satisfied" with the death sentences but "dismayed" that the ex-police chief was given only five years in jail.

Bangladesh has been in political turmoil since the end of Hasina's autocratic rule, and violence has marred campaigning for elections expected in February 2026.

The United Nations says up to 1,400 people were killed in crackdowns as Hasina tried to cling to power, deaths that were central to her trial.

Attorney General Md Asaduzzaman said the trial "pays the dues to the martyrs", while interim leader Muhammad Yunus called it an "historic verdict".

The trial heard months of testimony detailing how Hasina had ordered mass killings.

Hasina was backed by New Delhi, fraying relations between the two neighbours since her overthrow, and Bangladesh reiterated its call for India to extradite her.

India's foreign ministry said that it had "noted" the verdict, adding it was "committed to the best interests of the people of Bangladesh".

It did not comment immediately on Bangladesh's extradition request.

Security forces surrounded the court for the verdict, with armoured vehicles guarding checkpoints and thousands of police officers posted across the capital.

Crude bombs have been set off across Dhaka this month, mainly petrol bombs hurled at everything from buildings linked to Yunus's government to buses and Christian sites.

Bangladesh's foreign ministry summoned India's envoy to Dhaka this month, demanding that New Delhi block the "notorious fugitive" Hasina from talking to journalists and "granting her a platform to spew hatred".

The International Crisis Group said the "political repercussions of this verdict are significant", arguing that the prospect of Hasina "mounting a political comeback in Bangladesh now appears very slim".

"The process has not been without critics," ICG analyst Thomas Kean said.

"In absentia trials are often a source of contention, and in this case the speed with which the hearings were conducted and the apparent lack of resources for the defence also raise questions of fairness... But they should not be used to downplay or deflect from Sheikh Hasina's actions."

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Good stuff! Hope it happens in America next

[–] oneser@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The death penalty is archaic und should be abolished.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

eh, i'd argue there are plenty of examples where guilt, seriousness of crime, and complete inability of reform are all determinable with 100% accuracy.

some sociopaths out there, especially the kind that tend to be in high levels if government...really do only respond to threats to their life.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago

I'd argue that even if it's magically determined with 100% accuracy, we still shouldn't give the state the power to decide to kill them. It's unnecessary. Studies have shown that the harshness of the penalty is much less of a deterrent than the certainty of being caught, putting incorrigible sociopaths away in prisons or mental institutions for life is just as effective at both deterring and protecting.

The key is having a trustworthy justice system. If you don't have a trustworthy justice system then no amount of harshness helps, in fact it only hurts.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well yea but can we wait until we deal with the Nazi problem first?

[–] logi@piefed.world 2 points 2 days ago

"We" are not in power, so that's a given. And then I'm beginning to think that you'd have to get rid of pardon powers before it is safe to have a bunch of fascists in storage.

But in general, "we" can work on more than one thing at a time. Othdrwise "we" would be only working on global warming, right?