this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2025
84 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26418 readers
2667 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Their money or their life. Violence or general strike.

Could be both. Why put all the eggs in one basket?

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 week ago

Jesus fucking Christ these people literally can not do anything productive without trying some unhinged shit that stalls out the process. Why do we even pay Congress?

[–] etherphon@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago

This is not what the American people want, but then when has that ever mattered.

[–] Ancalagon@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unregulated.... Wants to be regulated by the party who cries about regulating, currently.

Lol fuck you American people

-from your esteemed Republicans

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Also really hard to regulate something that's federally illegal. They be doin' flips 'n' shit.

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Ffs, just legalize it already. Fucking clowns.

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Paid for by alcohol industry groups.

[–] amedd69@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Asking this because I'm dumb but, how exactly will this effect the current legal markets?

If I remember correctly, legal states still had weed prior to 2018. Did the 2018 Farm Bill benefit the legal markets in ways that I'm unfamiliar with? I assume it helped supply which this will undo but am I missing anything else?

[–] CordialCephalopod@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Dumbass here (so please don't take my word as gospel),

What this is referring to are products that have intoxicating effects that are derived from hemp. Those products have less than 0.3% THC by weight so they could be manufactured and sold because of provisions in the 2018 bill. It's an entirely separate product from traditional marijuana. States that have legalized weed won't have the "normal" weed market impacted

[–] amedd69@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ok gotcha. So sounds like I won't be able to walk into a gas station and get Delta-9 gummies in my illegal state but I'll still be able to go to the next state over and buy whatever I want from their legal dispensary.

Thanks for clearing that up

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

People will get the deltas shipped in from global shops or try making it themselves with dangerous chemicals that need be properly removed afterward, don’t worry. The price between delta 8 and delta 9 is just too wide that a country built on market capitalism and class-based disenfranchisement won’t be able to resist. You’ll have a less safe blackmarket soon enough, but the good news is that drug dealers don’t check ID so it’s technically more accessible to kids now too. /s

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Depending on what legal state you live next to, this ban may be eliminating any competition cutting into insanely marked up sales at your local state run monopoly.

[–] amedd69@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So just to clarify, you're saying weed prices may go up because of this?

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No, but I'll give you an example of what I mean.

I know this isn't the case in every state with medical or recreational, but I live in a state where the laws for medical cannabis were clearly set up to create a monopoly, and eliminate competition, so that only the state and friends of the state could profit.

The marijuana sold in the dispensary can only be grown by the state, and there isn't much variety in products available for purchase.

To qualify for a medical license, all of your information has to go into a state run database, and you have to pay some kind of annual fee to renew your license.

To be eligible to even open a dispensary and sell the state's legal marijuana, you had to already have an existing pharmacy in place for something like 8 years when the medical law was passed, and you had to meet very specific zoning laws. Not surprisingly all that criteria applied to only 1 family owned pharmacy.

Since there wasn't any competition, the state and the single dispensary were able to mark up their prices to an insane degree. But what are you going to do, they're the only game in town.

Except when private businesses started taking advantage of the legal federal loophole for THC products derived from hemp, it created a competitive market for people to purchase legal hemp derived THC products (THC seltzers, gummies, etc.). It started to cut into the state run monopoly's business, because clearly why would anyone keep paying for exorbitantly overpriced and pretty mediocre products if you didn't have to?

In other words, capitalism and the free market actually worked a little too well for the wrong people, so small government free market loving Republicans tried and failed to crack down on hemp derived THC products at the state level.

This ensures their monopoly can continue to exploit the public without having to worry about competitors cutting into their business. Weed prices won't go up (hopefully) but they can keep charging whatever they want because the federal government is eliminating their competition for them.

Again, I know this isn't the case in every state, but I would be very surprised to learn it's only the case in Louisiana.

God forbid the government ever be used to "overreach" into the lives of Americans by protecting them from exploitation and oppression by treasonous tyrants out to destroy democracy. This seems like a much more efficient use of the federal government.

(/s)mall gubamint doing what (/s)mall gubamints always manage to do for state run monopolies in our "free" market.

[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago