Welcome to c/linux!
Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!
Rules:
Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
No NSFW adult content
Follow general lemmy guidelines.
Hi!
Someone asked me to revive their 20 year old laptop as its no longer working on their installation of windows XP.
This baby has around 512MB of Ram, 1.6 GHZ Intel Atom.
This is my first time doing something with hardware older than myself so I'd love some insight from people around.
Everyone loves Ubuntu 24.04!
Tiny Core
This is the answer. Tiny Core is absolute best for old hardware as it gets running upto speed quickly takes very little resources and you can see what kind of resources it consumes and can add things to it to make it useful.
Doesn't Tiny Core load into RAM? With 512 MB that could be a problem. There are many versions of Puppy Linux. I think they load into RAM also. I would try MX Linux and see if that worked. Expanding the amount of RAM would be helpful, but it is not worth spending money on that machine. I bought a functioning Fujitsu laptop with a 6th gen Core i5 Processor and 8 GB RAM for $80 on Ebay. Computers with a 7th gen Intel Core Processor or older won't officially run Windows 11 so they are selling for cheap these days, if you shop around.
Tiny Core can loadit self into RAM, but it doesn't have to, you can do a normal install as well. Also even if you want to run it from RAM, it only takes 46MB in RAM not ideal but manageable with 512MB. Also you can even downgrade if you are not UI dependent, you can install the core (non-tiny version) and only needs 26MB RAM.
Also consider Windows XP requires 200 MB of RAM to function, before we run any apps at all, so Tiny taking 46 MB to run leaves a huge headroom.
TinyCore (loads itself into RAM), Puppy, Proteus and Zolin Lite will all be happy with 512 MiB.
Edit: also antiX, QOS, Slax and DSL.
Archbang, Slitaz, Sparky and MX may not support x86, double-check.
Also gentoo has a full binary-only version now.
Edit2:
Interesting that Zorin says their regular flavors are now efficient enough that they'll run just fine on older hardware, so there's no need to continue Zorin Lite:
It’s now possible to run the non-Lite editions of Zorin OS on computers with as little as 2 GB of RAM and on machines as old as 15 years, with higher performance than the Lite edition in some tasks.
Emphasis mine. Wow, only 2 GiB...
I recommend Puppy for the cutest distro! As long as you don't need/expect everything to work 100%
I'm gonna anti-recommend TinyCore unless you're an advanced user. The wiki is a trap full of outdated info spread across several different versions of the OS.
MX Linux.
It can run in in pretty much all hardware, and it's debian-based too!
It has Libreoffice, Firefox, etc. by default.
Heck; if you can't install it, you can just use is persistently from the USB!
Puppy Linux might be an option if that project is still going.
RAM will be an issue if they want a Desktop Environment. It would be good to find out max RAM that machine supported and purchase a replacement stick.
If you can get at least 2gig you might have an OK platform.
If you can't increase RAM then there is a cool project called HaikuOS that is super lightweight, they have some popular packages for it, butitd is not a Linux distro with tons of availabe apps. Its got a late 90s feel to it.
I'd be surprised if it could do even a gig.
The nb100 can go to 2gb of ddr2 but is only single channel, so it can't go to 3.25/4gb (32 bit cpu limit)
One thing you could try is Alpine Linux It is surprisingly lightweight, and pair it with something like OpenBox or maybe XFCE, and it might be quite good
Cute!!
Have you considered freeDOS? Would run rral snappy on there. Im doing that with my p3 64mb ram gateway.
Do you have a NIC that accepts DOS-based drivers or are you surviving without internet on it?
I dont use it on the web. It couldn't load any sites anyways.
Justin Bieber OS. Biebian > Debian
Just installed MiniOS on my 15 year old Dell Ultrabook. Small, fast and light.
512MB of ram? you could probably just run a command line terminal and call it a day. good luck, soldier. bringing that old warhorse back to life is a noble quest.
I wanted to say tiny Core, but someone gave that. So I'll give another suggestion. Use something XFCE based or LXQt based. Maybe mint in XFCE De is the way to go if you want a feature rich solution that is light on resources.
Maybe mint
Most ubuntu-based are 1 GiB minimum and dropped support for x86 though.
You are right, I had forgotten that, Mint XFCE might be 3gigs on HDD, but it's quite light on processor and RAM. Anyway my suggestion is invalid for x86 requirement.
FreeBSD
I would usually recommend Linux Mint, but damn that thing belongs in a museum!
Hell, why not put an antique OS like Windows XP for that antique piece of beauty?
It's running windows XP but it's currently unable to use any browsers as the user wants to use it for
There are workarounds but i'd discourage you from trying.
Go linux,
I'm afraid you're really shit outta luck as even Firefox is killing 32-bit.
You could prolly find someone who's kept some old versions of 32-bit FF, but using them on -today's- network with old-time security? Whoof. As for the OS, some older XFCE's WILL work OK w 500MB, but you'll be waiting on disk-swap a lot, and SSD options will be limited.
but using them on -today's- network with old-time security?
This has always been the main issue with older software, hasn't it?
LOL! Well, always is a long time, but not so much until the internet came along! And there are older versions of FF extensions like UBlockO still floating around out there. And it depends on what types of sites the user will be visiting.
DSL or one of the Puppy flavors.
Lots of good options already given, to throw a couple more one the pile Slackware if you want to play around with Linux more for a hobbyist than a user, Tails for a small Debian based security focused distro, or FreeBSD for something completely different but familiar, I've installed that on some pretty tiny hardware and it ran fine including an x86/atom CPU.
I don’t know for the other but tails doesn’t exist as a 32bit version, does it? I’m also not sure it would very comfortable on 512mb ram.
Yep that's my bad, looks like that's some old info I should have checked on. Tails dropped 32 bit x86 support in 2017 & wants more memory. A month ago freeBSD released a beta for 15.0 dropping support which is a bigger bummer for me since I like that OS for old hardware. Slackware still supports 32 and 64 bit architectures.
Are the BSDs generally good/workable on older hardware, especially laptops? I don’t really have a clue (no knowledge beyond Linux) but if so it sounds like a nice use for an old laptop, as a learning tool.
I used it for that reason on one of those mini acer aspire one atom CPU laptops and another that was x86 Intel and didn't have any problems. I think it's a common use case but not the purpose of the OS just as general purpose not specifically targeting old hardware. It looks like they are switching to 64 bit only if the current beta is indicative of the next release which is very likely.
https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/what-to-expect-on-upcoming-15-0-release.98543/
There was recently another user asking the same for a similar machine on the .ml Linux comm.
As I did there, I can only tell you I successfully ran antix on a similarly old eee-pc from 2007ish, with the same CPU. It did have 1gb of ram though iirc, but the distro ran fairly comfortably (until it came to browsing with many tabs open).
Antix probably
Debian GNU/Hurd 🤤
Void Linux?
That keyboard looks like its amazing to type on.
Id say buying more ram (if it supports it) is necessary.