this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
194 points (99.0% liked)

politics

26418 readers
2691 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This president will stop at nothing to take food out of the mouths of hungry kids across America. Soulless,” said Democratic Sen. Patty Murray.

Rep. Angie Craig (D-Minn.), the top Democrat on the House Agriculture Committee, said in a statement that it appears the Trump administration is “demanding that food assistance be taken away from the households that have already received it.”

“They would rather go door to door, taking away people’s food, than do the right thing and fully fund SNAP for November so that struggling veterans, seniors, and children can keep food on the table,” said Craig.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 68 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wow this guy really likes punching down. Back in my day that was a sign of a coward. A bully. A shitbag. Generally the type of person a proud, upstanding person wouldn't associate with.

Man these times really are a-changing.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Man these times really are a-changing.

I dunno, seems true today too.

Just the positions we thought would be filled with proud and upstanding people are... Not.

[–] paper_moon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Oh they're filled with Proud.. Somethings...

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh they have a certain kind of "pride" for sure. Just not the upstanding citizen sort of pride.

[–] paper_moon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, we can't put all of the blame on them, they're just Boys after all. Boys... That are Proud.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No it's sort of - a Red Pride. Wait no that's not right. Blue pride? Well, whatever, they sure have a lot of it.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 3 points 1 week ago

Alabaster maybe?

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh I'm referring to his cult-like following.

The fact that they still admire him speaks volumes to their personality.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I understood, I was just pointing out his cultists are not upstanding citizens as we would define them.

You know, with a basic grasp of humanity and the tiniest bit of empathy required to recognize the walking poop bag for what he is.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No, but I'm sure they think of themselves as fine, upstanding people.

They need to reflect on why they admire a bully, then. Not even a good bully. A cowardly one. Who punches down. One who dishes it out but couldn't take it himself.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 53 points 1 week ago

Fuck Trump. Here's to him seeing the world from Mussolini's perspective 🙃

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How's that capitulation working out for you, Democratic Party? Sheesh.

[–] PKscope@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm just over it at this point. I'm tired of expecting anyone to stand up to this clown. Either I'm missing a big part of the puzzle or the leverage this guy has on everyone in DC is unprecedented.

[–] criscodisco@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Same here. The political establishment in the US is rotten all the way to its core.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

The smart move here is to force Trump into the State courts to dispute it.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Thought government shutdown is over? Is still going refuse to fund snap even after the shutdown is over.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s not. Things still need to pass house and get signed by Trump.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Won't matter even if he signs it he will find a way to not pay snap.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah ms neithet wouldn't surprise me if snap ends altogether in red states .

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Does that like hurt their base though? When they probably should be worried about losing votes at the midterms?

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

They don't give a shit, the fucking morons will still vote Republican anything but a Democrat.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

raises EBT card into the air

From my cold, dead hands!

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Careful what you wish for, that probably isn't out of the question.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 1 week ago

Either way, the bullshit ends. 🤷‍♂️

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

They also said it’d be impossible to refund tariffs.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Is it costing him anything to let the states feed people?