this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2025
693 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

76945 readers
3054 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] XLE@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

Alex Karp thinks people only care about one kind of surveillance. And he thinks he will alleviate our fears if he gives us a pinky promise not to surveil us in that one way.

That way is cheating.

He later brings this up again, saying that most surveillance technology isn’t determining, “Am I shagging too many people on the side and lying to my partner?” Your guess is as good as any as to what that’s all about.

Well, thanks for clearing that up, Alex. That was indeed my sole concern.

(The rest of the article is full of indecipherable quotes from Alex, which demonstrates you don't need to be smart to be rich.)

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago

seems like less of a threat than US bases surveillance/MOSSAD assisted tech.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Hot take from Tech Bro Bevis

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why can't we win the AI race and still not have a surveillance state? Those don't seem like they have to be linked...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Wow, they really are just gonna make you kill them eh, for like, no good reason.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

AI race to the bottom. Ever thought of asking the people instead?

[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago

Palantir CEO will be among the first to be lined up against the wall when the revolution comes.

[–] lmuel@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

How do you win this race? By having the most capable unsustainable LLM? Not sure if I care...

[–] ronigami@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

just call him by his name ffs

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

I hope he puts some camaras near his house. Then we'll all know where he is at all times.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

"When did Saruman the white abandon reason for madness"

[–] BurnedDonutHole@ani.social 3 points 1 week ago

The Singularity Trap by Dennis E. Taylor (2018) The book defines a sci-fi universe where humanity must escape from an overwhelming AI entity. The solution, as demonstrated by the main character, is to be turned into a machine using nanomachines, yet somehow retain one's humanity. When I raised the issue of this kind of story's inherent paradox and flawed logic—where the solution to saving humanity from an AI entity seeking to destroy all natural biological life is to turn into machines—people responded that they still enjoyed the narrative. Therefore, I wouldn't be surprised if this idiot's stament gathered widespread support.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›