this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
72 points (93.9% liked)

science

22613 readers
398 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] trailee@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The Guardian gives some good context on trump’s public back and forth on Isaacman, but it’s disappointing not to see a peep about what Sean Duffy has done to NASA in the intervening months. NASA has been gutted. Climate science is, predictably, especially disfavored, but they’ve also dealt a major blow to graduate academia and really all of science in the US.

Maybe now that most of the house has been burned down, Isaacman can be trusted to funnel much of the public purse into SpaceX or other rocketry billionaires and focus on Mars like a good boy. It doesn’t matter if he once voted Democrat if it’s too hard for him to put the old priorities back into place even if he wanted to.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 13 points 2 weeks ago

Oh look

The continuing merger of state and corporate power

[–] jaek@aussie.zone 5 points 2 weeks ago

That dudes head looks like an experimental glider.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

And so NASAs focus shifts almost entirely to PR stunts

And watch him rename it XASA or NAXA or something stupid.

[–] trailee@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago

MASA, an apt name for the current times. Billionaires want all of us to call them masa.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Really reading the room after his rebuke last night.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

He can't even read a "Cat in the Hat" book.