trailee

joined 2 years ago
[–] trailee@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Trump Pandemic Response II: Electric Boogaloo

What’s an ICE agent to do with virus masking mandates???

Get ready for bleach and the light inside the body.

[–] trailee@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

One way companies like Amazon try to minimize that is by placing their supply chain closer to customers to reduce mileage and improve speed for the customer. Their goal is to make the journey fast and effective, but reduce its emissions at the same time.

“By really leveraging our supply chain efficiencies that we have at scale, we’re able to both offer better speed and sustainability outcomes at the same time,” said Chris Atkins, director of Worldwide Operations Sustainability at Amazon.

Greenwashing. Amazon doesn’t give two shits about emissions, only about costs. You can order 5 items at once with grouped shipping but still have them show up in 4 different deliveries over the subsequent 3 days.

People are more likely to delay or consolidate orders once they understand the environmental impact of fast shipping, according to Sreedevi

That part is true, which is why Amazon offers “lower carbon delivery” as one of its slower options. But it’s primarily emotional manipulation of customers to reduce their timeliness expectations. Reduced emissions just happen to be a side effect that’s convenient to emphasize.

[–] trailee@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In my experience “over easy” generally still has a bit of runny white, and that’s just gross. It’s difficult to get the white fully set and still keep the yolk runny, but I always err on the side of a disappointingly set yolk.

[–] trailee@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Eggs over medium (lightly fried on both sides, white fully set, yolk very runny once punctured). Runny eggs are great by themselves or with other breakfast items, particularly toast or hash browns to soak up the sauce.

[–] trailee@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

blocked me without responding

How dare you reach out to inquire how to view his art! The nerve!

Great job tracking it down. It’s too bad Latvia doesn’t have any rights to their performance.

[–] trailee@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 weeks ago

Or stealing lit cigarettes out of human mouths. That’s a kind of comedy gold I can get behind.

[–] trailee@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is this first time I’ve missed “watch post” as an option on Lemmy. I want to know if you find it!

[–] trailee@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 weeks ago

There’s no aggregate karma on lemmy, so farming is meaningless.

Upvote posts and comments that are particularly interesting/valuable/topical/insightful, which often means that I agree. Downvote those that detract from meaningful discussion. Sometimes downvote on disagreement is a fine line, and it mostly depends on why I’m disagreeing with the author. If their opinion is racism, sure they get a downvote, and if they’re particularly abusive maybe also a report. But if they just see things differently that’s neutral.

I probably only vote on about 5% of the content I read, and engage in comments in 1%. As a poster I expect similar numbers from others. I don’t get over collecting fake internet points, but it’s important feedback to understand that people out there are reading your content and that someone finds it meaningful or useful enough to upvote. If you were just yelling into the void with no engagement, you’d likely stop pretty quickly.

I’m vaguely aware that I’m feeding the LLMs of tomorrow, but I engage in the fediverse to interact with humans today, and it’s important to see that some humans get value from the content. Formulating comments is a lot more effort than clicking the up arrow, and there’s often no real need to elaborate - 20 “I agree!” comments would just be annoying for everyone to read.

[–] trailee@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Oh you’ve misread my mentality. I’m very concerned about all of the terrible things happening in the country and I have plenty of friends in marginalized groups to believe.

The point of this post was actually about how creepy it is that USCIS has fully embraced facial recognition and feels it has a sufficiently low error rate to use it with no secondary validation for approving citizen reentry (at least at airports where all passengers are sufficiently well off to afford plane tickets). That gives a lot of credibility to otherwise unsubstantiated concerns about government surveillance and the consequences thereof.

[–] trailee@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I fully believe racial profiling is real and as a white male I look like the maga demographic and benefit from the institutionalized racism. Although in the particular immigration experience I posted about I was also traveling with someone US-naturalized South Asian-born with heavy accent and someone with dark skin and stereotypical “black hair” and all of us sailed through. So did everyone else in the line with us.

It was a stark contrast to the fascist paramilitary abduction videos we’ve been seeing from all across the country (see !gestapo_usa@lemmy.dbzer0.com). I’m not sure what to think of it.

[–] trailee@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago
[–] trailee@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Do you presume I’m a white male because I seem to have the privilege to find this immigration database problematic rather than living with daily oppression in all sorts of other ways? Perhaps that’s true.

 

US citizen here. I recently returned from my first international travel in a few years, and I was unpleasantly surprised by how easy it was to get back into the country.

In the returning citizens line, everyone was directed by an officer to one of three tablets each on a stand about 3-4 feet high. You stuck your face in the right spot for the camera and the tablet turned green. And that was it, free to go. No conversation with a human about where you went, no human verifying your passport, no need for the passport at all. Just a face scan (presumably matching a database of digitized passport photos) and you’re done.

Makes me wonder what the bar is for various local law enforcement or different federal agencies to get access to the database and hook in with surveillance cameras.

 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.social/post/1359360

Climate goals go up in smoke as US datacenters turn to coal

 

Let’s say I’m browsing Home and come across an interesting post by user@a.lemmy in community b.lemmy/c/whatever, while my home instance is c.lemmy. If I use the share button to get a link to the post, which server should it point to?

Maybe this is my misunderstanding of federation, but I think my client is doing all of its interaction with c.lemmy and everything is marked with where it came from. So the user originally submitted it to a.lemmy, whose backend then replicated it over to b.lemmy and from there out to all other instances that federate with b.

In my mind, the appropriate way to reference the post in question is via the server that hosts the community, b.lemmy. But when I get a link from Voyager’s share button, it points to a.lemmy. Is this a feature or a bug?

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/50309495

NASA chief to defy agency's charter, terminating science

 

This is the swivel mechanism for the high pressure air at the center of my Campbell Hausfeld automatic retracting air hose reel. That hose is crimped directly on the swivel mechanism instead of adding negligible cost with a threaded fitting.

The upshot is that the hose is not replaceable by itself if damaged. And of course parts are not readily available. Throw out the whole thing instead and buy something new. Assholes.

 

Incogni has great advertising claims, but it feels pretty expensive as an ongoing subscription. Have you used it or do you currently use it? Please tell me about it.

view more: next ›