this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2025
121 points (97.6% liked)

politics

26475 readers
1239 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump threatened to deploy more troops to U.S. cities this week — and not just the National Guard — as part of what he describes as his national crackdown on crime.

Political data points to a clear opportunity for Trump and the Republicans.

Though FBI data show that violent crime decreased by 4.5 percent last year, a new Gallup poll released Thursday shows almost half of Americans — 49 percent — feel that crime has risen from last year — while about a third — or 33 percent — feel crime has gone down.

The Gallup poll also reveals some political risks for Trump. More Americans oppose using federal troops to combat domestic crime than support the move — but the divide is largely along political lines, as Republicans overwhelmingly support the use of troops while Democrats are opposed.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 35 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

But is it a crackdown on crime, or a crackdown on people Trump dislikes, or a political intimidation tactic, or a theatrical show of strength? These uncritical headlines are frustrating.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

If it were a actually a crackdown on crime the troops would go to red states and the Epstein flies would be released.
This is 100% a fascist power move.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Even though Republicans CUT my SNAP Benefits and RAISED me Health Insurance Premiums and are PROTECTING Jeffrey Epstein while Pardoning SEX CRIMINALS I STILL am going to Vote for them because NONE of that Compares to the Love I feel when UNIDENTIFIED ARMED MEN KIDNAP CHILDREN AND TAKE THEM TO UNDISCLOSED LOCATIONS AWAY FROM ANY PRYING EYES!

[–] PodPerson@lemmy.zip 18 points 3 weeks ago

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Y'know, I want to dismiss Americans being dumb, and they are, but thinking a little deeper about my own neighborhood and it might feel like there's more crime because... surprise, there's more homeless or struggling financially. Things very much look worse outside, although it's somehow not understood that cities often provide care to the poor which reduces crime.

Admittedly, a majority of those ignorant people also just... never visit a city and get all their news via propaganda, but I wonder if their small towns also have increased poverty without the safeguards we have in the city, resulting in increases in crime. Wouldn't be the first time the right projected their problems onto the rest of us.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Self reinforcing policy for republicans in the US. Just keep making things shittier and more difficult which causes more unrest, so they justify more extreme responses and power grabs. Sounds like they know exactly what they’re doing.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I keep hearing about troops being sent into cities to "crack down on crime", but nothing about any actual criminal being brought to justice by them. Weird.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

And there's NPR swallowing the Trump narrative, as usual. They're no different than corporate media.

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

I used to listen to NPR a lot, but stopped a year or so ago because they both sides every single story. They're complicit in our descent into fascism.

[–] CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 3 weeks ago

NPR has always been the voice of the state. Nothing new here. I remember after 9/11 they would have these long drawn out stories about whether or not there was any evidence of WMD's but every story would end with, "but the government says blah blah blah" thus overriding the last 30 minutes with the party line.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 weeks ago

This is the result of squeezing the populace until there is almost no juice left and then not providing any real opportunities to thrive. Is there a happy community anywhere in the old USA?

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago

Kidnappings have gone way up

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

More crime is committed in red states than blue, assclown, how about you start there?

Actually you know what how about we deal with the fucking felon in the WH and all his pedo cronies first???