this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
649 points (98.9% liked)

Actually Infuriating

779 readers
1 users here now

Community Rules:

Be CivilPlease treat others with decency. No bigotry (disparaging comments about any race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexuality, nationality, ability, age, etc). Personal attacks and bad-faith argumentation are not allowed.

Content should be actually infuriatingPolitics and news are allowed, as well as everyday life. However, please consider posting in partner communities below if it is a better fit.

Mark NSFW/NSFL postsPlease mark anything distressing (death, gore, etc.) as NSFW and clearly label it in the title.

Keep it Legal and MoralNo promoting violence, DOXXing, brigading, harassment, misinformation, spam, etc.

Partner Communities

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 227 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

What about the 5 billion dollar contingency fund that is supposed to cover things such as a government shutdown?

https://www.cbpp.org/research/food-assistance/snaps-contingency-reserve-is-available-for-regular-snap-benefits-as-usda

Republicans are cowards and are intentionally choosing to hurt those that actually need assistance.

[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 66 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

My conspiracy theory, and I'm uneducated in these matters, is that they've done something with that emergency fund. Since the money isn't there anymore they're caught between admitting they misapropriated/stole it or starving people.

[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 94 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Or they want people to starve to incite the riots that allows them to apply more military pressure. I hate that that's a sentence I said with so sense of irony

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 weeks ago

Yep, this is my belief. Trump has been looking for a reason to enact martial law. He's been making up excuses to extend his enforcement groups throughout the US, and large protests/riots would give them the opportunity.

This isn't to say they shouldn't be done. I'd argue they should. That's their plan, and their hand should be forced if that's the way it's going to go. If it doesn't happen over this, it'll be something else, and the imagery of them clamping down on starving people is about the best we could hope for. There is just about no one who doesn't at least see their plight. It'd be the best rallying cry for all Americans, and potentially to outsiders who would help as well.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 3 weeks ago

They already diverted FEMA aid funding toward building concentration camps, everything Elon did with DOGE was so amazingly illegal that he'd be in jail for centuries if convincted of all of it, Trump refused to send money to NYC/NY, other states...

Yeah, the convicted rapist conman fraudster bankruptor in chief?

Turns out he doesn't give a fuck about rules, he does what he wants because no one has ever stopped him, and our system and society are built to reward and enable sociopathic behavior, or at the very least, are very very far from robust enough to stop him.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 3 weeks ago

They're using it to keep the military on their side in order to launch a dictatorship. Just my conjecture

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 144 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Of course it is.

Fascists do not respect the law.

Wait till you find out that they also don't willingly give up power and what has to be done when they don't.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 31 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

It’s more fun when they see what giving them 4 years to purge rank and solidify their hold over the country does when you finally decide to actually start to fight back.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 114 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No one is holding the president or republicans accountable, so it does not matter if it is illegal or not.

I have a feeling if George Santos had been elected in 2024 he would still be in Congress today.

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 45 points 3 weeks ago

"the law" is literally meaningless when no one enforces it

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 80 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Seeing that kind of slanted political vernacular outside of a tabloid and written as a notification on an official government website is incredibly embarrassing.

I'm cringing at how little the Republicans are even bothering to appear like normal people anymore. FFS, run it through ChatGPT or something, you were capable of at least pretending you were not ghouls with fewer tools at your disposal 8 years ago. Who are these government stooges taking Trump and Hegseth instructions for the website banners verbatim?

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 28 points 3 weeks ago

Some people are broken. Some are broken like a bone, where with the right treatment it can heal. It might never be as good as a bone that never broke, but it can get pretty close. Other people are broken like a glass window. That's never getting put back together, and everyone around is in danger of stepping on the glass.

Many Republicans are broken like shattered glass.

[–] Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

I feel like this has Stephen Miller written all over it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 66 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Republican when addressing the general public: SNAP recipients are fat lazy freeloaders who spend thousands of dollars of SNAP benefits on soda and chips.

Republicans when addressing SNAP recipients: "Mothers, babies, and the most vulnerable among us"

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It has always been the habit of rightists to co-opt leftist terminology in furtherance of their evil deceptions and propaganda. This is why George Orwell called the fascist party in “1984” IngSoc, which stood ironically for “English Socialism.”

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 55 points 3 weeks ago

You're talking about dipshits that are murdering folks in the Caribbean because they like how the boats explode on the drone camera.

Laws are just wallpaper to these assholes.

[–] OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world 49 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Laws only work if they're enforced. Not only is our corrupt government bought and paid for; the Supreme Court is toothless as well.

America has fallen.

[–] kunaltyagi@programming.dev 13 points 3 weeks ago

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? It's a hard problem, but way harder when you rely on unwritten or vague rules subject to interpretation and goodwill of those in power.

USA since 2016 has been a warning to other places. Keep journalism fair, alive and protected (take a hint Australia, UK). Give rights to protestors (take a hint UK, Germany). Make decorum or traditions into acts of law or part of constitution (take a hint world) so those in power have to follow them.

And make it super easy to impeach and ban via popular vote (say by plurality of at least 40% of voting population. None of this super-majority). Better safe than sorry

[–] Unlearned9545@lemmy.world 39 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Republicans use the list of things that are illegal as their personal todo list.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 37 points 3 weeks ago

It is but who’s going to enforce it?

[–] gerowen@lemmy.world 31 points 3 weeks ago

I'm a veteran and have been getting emails from the VA blaming Democrats for the shutdown; it's very unprofessional.

[–] Flickerby@lemmy.zip 31 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You honestly think laws still apply to this fascist regime? We're long past that

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

All Republicans must go to prison

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago

Yes. But do they care? Do they have to care anymore?

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 weeks ago

Entirely white house decision, now with court order to not do it, to not pay SNAP. It's not just a violation of Hatch act, there's, or used to be, an official law preventing propaganda against US citizens.

[–] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If we ever get true people's representation in government priority number one will be to prosecute all the fuckwads who have been perpetrating this. Unfortunately, I am not hopeful that this will happen.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It will happen. The question is whether it'll happen in time to hold anyone meaningfully accountable

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

History has shown that the US does not hold anyone in power accountable. Sometimes we pretend to do so by punishing lackeys like Oliver North instead of presidents and politicians who make the decisions to do horribletand illegal things.

SCOTUS knew Trump was going to do this Project 2025 shit, which is why they said the president is above the law and forced Trump on Colorado's ballot to legitimize an insurrectionist running for office.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Lutra@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The Hatch Act Explained

The Hatch Act is a U.S. federal law that was enacted in 1939 to restrict political activities of federal employees, as well as certain state and local government employees, and those working in federally funded programs. The main goal of the act is to maintain a federal workforce that is impartial and free from political pressure.

Key Provisions of the Hatch Act

Prohibitions on Political Activities Federal employees are prohibited from running for office in partisan elections, engaging in political campaigning while on duty, or using their official positions to influence elections.

Permitted Activities Employees can participate in political activities when off duty and not wearing their official uniforms. They may also express personal opinions on political issues or candidates.

Impact and Enforcement

The Hatch Act is enforced by the U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC), which can investigate violations and recommend disciplinary actions. Violating the Hatch Act can result in consequences ranging from reprimands to removal from federal employment.

Importance

The act aims to ensure that government decisions are based on merit rather than political affiliation, promoting a civil service that is dedicated to serving the public rather than political interests.___

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It mostly certainly is, but the rule of law would need to matter for that to be pertinent to anything. Not sure if you've been paying attention, but...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

ice said there was a criminal in a community and busted down every private residence door, tossed the places, and took everyone into custody. This is exactly the behavior form british military in the colonies that lead to the restriction on search and seizure in the constitution.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And these hatch act violations are coming from the same people that say that it's illegal for them to fund snap. Clearly the law is only to be used when it is convenient for them politically.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

I mean a (Republican)congress member put forward a bill to fund SNAP during the shutdown. Why it didn't fly through.... 100% on Republicans

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

You honestly think the GOP gives a shit if something is legal?

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 weeks ago

The Republicans have been playing fast and loose with legality for pretty much ever.

Fortunately, the majority of Americans seem to know this message is a steaming pile of horseshit.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 weeks ago

Jesus Christ it's so embarassing reading official statements from government bodies playing the blame game like 5 year olds.

[–] sudo@lemmy.today 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Huh, so they're against all genital mutilation right? Like circumcision?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Modern right wingers have literally one question at the center of their morality. "How much do I think that this thing will help or harm me in the goal of getting what I want?" The value of everything hinges on the answer to that question. The extent to which it helps or harms as well as the perspective and priorities of the "thinker" may change the answer to this question at any moment, which makes the answer fluid. There is no other objective morality.

The result is the obsolescence of facts and reality. Is this against the Hatch Act? That's a question asked from a place of ignorance. Right now, would it being against the Hatch Act help or harm these fascist fucks? Likely, in the short term, it might harm them. If that's the mentality of the moment, then it is clearly outside the boundaries of what is covered by the Hatch Act - it does not apply. If next year the roles were reversed and the opposition did literally, in every single way, the exact same action then it's clearly illegal and should be dealt with using the harshest penalties. Actually, it might surpass such quaint rules and be outright treasonous. Perhaps those traitors should be hanged.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

its the same thing the ohio govorner did when the trains derailed in 2023, refused to enact a state of emergency while claiming hes been "asking for help" which he dint do. he knows the dimwitted supporters arnt going to research futher into his claims, as long as he can prolong the disaster it gains them more support.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 12 points 3 weeks ago

They didn't even take action when he tried a coup in broad daylight. What do you think they're going to do about this?

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Why are you trying to fight them by arguing how illegal they are? Better to tell people what to do. Who to vote for, who to fund, tips for working against this administration.

We may not be able to resort to violence (legaly, and over social media), but we can still do everything else in our power to bring them down. We can cut into their tax income, steal their voters, sue and report many of their followers.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›