this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
315 points (100.0% liked)

196

18556 readers
75 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Love Museum, Seoul, South Korea

The day love died:

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 year ago

Bummer. Looks like there are some captures of the old site from the wayback machine

still some photos of exhibits floating around if you search

[–] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I know someone who's gonna be really disappointed.

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 9 points 1 year ago

My god that character behind her scares me the first time I saw him

[–] GluWu@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago

This is a masturbation only museum you filthy animals.

[–] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

See, that comma is doing some interesting work here. My interpretation is that sex itself is not allowed to enter the museum. I'm not seeing any rules prohibiting patrons from engaging in naked fun time.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That museum is great, but "museum" is perhaps too high falutin of a term for it. As I recall they had one thing that could be considered an exhibit, about the history of drawn erotica in Korea. The rest was like sexy statues and such.

Still worth the trip.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sounds a bit like the sex museum in Amsterdam. Weeee bit of cultural stuff thrown in but mainly just shock factor for the tourists.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago

Museum of Sex in New York seemed alright. Had a collection of Tijuana Bibles. It's been a while since I went, but I dunno if I'd consider any of it particularly shocking given what it's meant to be. That can be very subjective, of course.

One thing is that a well run academic museum does collections first and exhibits second. 99% of what they have is stored away for safekeeping, and can only be viewed and handled by qualified academics who make an appointment. I'm not sure any of these places would qualify.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago

Even that one seemed to have a little more historical gravitas, but that was definitely great too.

Zoomed in on her face, accidentally got a jumpscare from the kid behind her.

[–] Visstix@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's always a reason why they had to put it on a sign.

[–] Old_Jimmy_Twodicks@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Getting strong Lionel Hutz vibes from the comma placement..."No, sex!"

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Better get rid of this bar association logo too.

[–] nicki@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago

Just pretend to be part of the exhibition.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago

It's a love museum, after all, not a sex museum.

[–] NakariLexfortaine@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

I see where your confusion came from. You're looking for the interactive museum.

Just down the road.

[–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Challenge accepted!

*fucks a burger

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I can't believe I'm about to type "love museum" into the internet.

...

I can't believe the first result was an exhibition about Vincent van Gogh at the National Gallery.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 3 points 1 year ago

Filed under false advertising, wtf?

[–] Jimbo@yiffit.net 3 points 1 year ago