this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2025
69 points (97.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

16471 readers
249 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At least it fits in a bike lane. That's nice.

That price is quite something, though.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] huppakee@piefed.social 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Fuck cars, yes - but vehicles exactly as wide as a standard width bike lane can fuck right off too.

[–] destructdisc@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I looked at the tech specs and it's 924mm wide, which is slightly wider than the average cargo bike or trike. A typical bike lane is anywhere from 2 to 4m wide, which should leave enough space for passing or oncoming bike traffic I think.

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

A typical bike lane is anywhere from 2 to 4m wide,

I wonder how many people are posting from places where 1m is a decently sized bike lane.

[–] themusicman@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Cries in New Zealand where consistent 1m is a luxury. We have bike lanes which sometimes narrow to 1m for both lanes

[–] destructdisc@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

You guys have bike lanes? 🙃

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 3 points 9 months ago

which should leave enough space for passing or oncoming bike traffic I think.

This would decide for 90% if I'm happy with these things driving around.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Fuck cars

Car classified as bike

Please no lol. I want bikes and trains, not rip off mini cars.

[–] destructdisc@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

You gotta admit this is a damn sight better than gigantic conventional pickup trucks though

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This is a great concept, with two big BUTs.

1)this shouldn't be allowed on a bike lane, or, god forbid, sidewalk 2) it should require a license

Otherwise, people get hurt.

[–] mogranja@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The deciding factor on whether something needs a license is usually speed. If this goes slow enough, it would be fine without a license, IMO

[–] destructdisc@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Top speed on this thing is 25kph (at least in the UK).

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Hm, I think it SHOULD be about injury risk, which is a combination of speed and damage upon impact. The latter is a combination of speed and mass. And it looks heavy.

[–] decended_being@midwest.social 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Pretty dumb that the pedals aren't connected, and are instead an overly complex "go" button.

But vehicles like this are great to have, as long as your city has the infrastructure to support bikes, walking, and public transit.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Reading your comment about the pedals not being connected, I assumed this was the new bike/quad from rivian sub-brand Also. It's not, but that makes me worried that this is a trend that will catch on.

if I only had one child instead of two, I would get a kei truck

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 months ago

Price shows the problem with the economics. You can get this brand new for $15k, or you can get an SUV in reasonable condition.

Which has been a problem for a long time. Let me introduce you to the CitiCar. Starting production in 1974, it has a 2.5hp motor and a 36V battery giving you a whopping 40 miles of range. This would cost you $2,988 in 1974 (going by the best source I could find), or about $20k now.

But why would you do that when there are tons of used cars for less than that? It's hard to justify as anything more than an expensive novelty.

To be clear, I'm quite aware of all the reasons cars as we know them are terrible and do terrible things to our cities. When the average person looks at the price tag, though, they're not going to be convinced. They see something just as expensive as a car (at least as far as the piece of paper right in front of them says), is seemingly less capable than a car, and then go buy the car.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 9 months ago

wish the back could be engineered to fold our seats or such. something like the way minivans can fold the seats down and do cargo or passengers.

[–] owsei@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Pretty sure a car is supposed to go "vroom vroom" instead of "tuk tuk". But idk, I'm not a car person

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 5 points 9 months ago

then where do you put tuktuks?