Good. I hope the state supreme court doesn't overturn this ruling.
this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
417 points (100.0% liked)
News
36867 readers
2454 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Doesn't matter: there's no one to enforce the judge's ruling and no penalty for refusing, so anyone who does decide not to certify an election faces...sternly worded letter? lawsuit? contempt of court if that goes against them?
As we saw through Trump's first term, laws only work if there are penalties, and penalties only work if there is someone to enforce them.
Contempt and jail. For low-level officials it happens. See Kim Davis, the clerk that refused to issue a marriage certificate for a gay marriage.
That took 2 months. She served 4 days while deputies were empowered by another court case to do her job and right-wing nutjobs paid her bills. Then she met the Pope.
A Georgia election official who gums up the works for two months to give cover to a Trump victory is getting a big promotion.
And can ride the grift train for at least a season, and since this is election denial related, every 2 years at the least.
These dicks will sell out our democracy for a ticket on that train in a heartbeat
Seems to me there has been many sponsored or wealthy who don’t mind getting a slap on the wrist, or suffer jail time after years of court. It seems to be a great way to advance careers and influence.
I’ve yet to see a regular person flouting such rules.
The system may be broken
That's the system working exactly as designed unfortunately.
Challenge accepted.
We're 3 weeks away from the elections. It's a hard sell thinking anything government related gets sorted in that time frame.
Ha. Courts can move fast when there are luxury vacations and RVs on the line.
"It's not an RV, it's a motorcoach"
a sentence that sounds best when shouted from a prison cell
This is definitely going to be used by election deniers to say "See, they really don't want fair elections." I'm not sure I really understand the role of election certification if it has to happen regardless by law. What is to be done in the case of real election interference or fraud?
Edit: Turns out reading the article can help 😅
Judge McBurney wrote that nothing in Georgia law gives county election officials the authority to determine that fraud has occurred or what should be done about it. Instead, he wrote, the law says a county election official's “concerns about fraud or systemic error are to be noted and shared with the appropriate authorities but they are not a basis for a superintendent to decline to certify.”
I may be a jackoff, but I'm not so big of a jackoff that a judge needs to tell me to do my job.
FUCKING CHRIST!
THIS SHOULDN'T NEED A FUCKING RULING!
WHETHER OR NOT THE PRESIDENT CAN COMMIT CRIMES SHOULDN'T HAVE NEEDED A FUCKING RULING!
I understand your frustration but have to add to it: These are the kind of people who will ignore the ruling anyway unless the election results suit them
We're so fucked. I hate it.
Thank you, Robert McBurney!
for what? paying lip service without including any enforcement or penalties?
trump is able to do his shit because no one will enforce the law on him and this will likely go down the same way.
How is this not already the rule for decades?
Probably cause it's one of those that didn't need to be said.
Like it isn't written in law that you shouldn't shit in a plane aisle but people probably assume it's a nono.
True true, we shouldn't need laws telling people not to be a dick.
It has been. The law is unambiguous, and the judge was just applying the existing law in this case.