this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2025
147 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26427 readers
2508 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The admiral who leads U.S. military forces in Latin America will step down at the end of this year, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced on Thursday, in a surprise move amid escalating tensions with Venezuela.

Alvin Holsey took over the U.S. military's Southern Command late last year for a position that normally lasts three years. A source familiar with the matter told Reuters that there had been tension between him and Hegseth and questions about whether he would be fired in the days leading up to the announcement.

Hegseth, in his social media post, did not disclose the reason for the departure of Holsey, who is one of only two Black four-star officers leading a U.S. combatant command.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 70 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Must've refused an illegal order

Like blowing up random civilians without any intel?

[–] Ancalagon@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No, they love to parade around black people who they've somehow managed to convince to follow them into Hell. It's great cover for the horrible things they have planned for black working class communities

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

no no you're thinking of the 1990s/2000s ~~fascists~~ republicans.

Todays WARFIGHTERS don't even pretend. It's too nuanced for them to handle.

[–] Ancalagon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, see all the firings of people of color and people with no dicks. And then the firings to hold people accountable.

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I could see someone in his shoes be worried about war crimes or crimes against humanity at this point. Even if they ARE drug dealers, you can't just blow up the boat and it's also very possible they've killed innocent bystanders.

[–] witten@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also, they're not drug dealers.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 8 points 1 month ago

It literally wouldn't matter if they were, but the only reason to murder them out of hand was to not have a trial

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Holsey molsey!

[–] No_Ones_Slick_Like_Gaston@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'd say maybe he didn't see the whole Venezuela op as a win for any American citizen, who knows now what's the real intention of the American regime.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Oh I think you know.