RSS
this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
20 points (95.5% liked)
Political Discussion and Commentary
1086 readers
1 users here now
A place to discuss politics and offer political commentary. Self posts are preferred, but links to current events and news are allowed. Opinion pieces are welcome on a case by case basis, and discussion of and disagreement about issues is encouraged!
The intent is for this community to be an area for open & respectful discussion on current political issues, news & events, and that means we all have a responsibility to be open, honest, and sincere. We place as much emphasis on good content as good behavior, but the latter is more important if we want to ensure this community remains healthy and vibrant.
Content Rules:
- Self posts preferred.
- Opinion pieces and editorials are allowed on a case by case basis.
- No spam or self promotion.
- Do not post grievances about other communities or their moderators.
Commentary Rules
- Don’t be a jerk or do anything to prevent honest discussion.
- Stay on topic.
- Don’t criticize the person, criticize the argument.
- Provide credible sources whenever possible.
- Report bad behavior, please don’t retaliate. Reciprocal bad behavior will reflect poorly on both parties.
- Seek rule enforcement clarification via private message, not in comment threads.
- Abide by Lemmy's terms of service (attacks on other users, privacy, discrimination, etc).
Please try to up/downvote based on contribution to discussion, not on whether you agree or disagree with the commenter.
Partnered Communities:
• Politics
• Science
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Based on the reference to political doomscrolling, I assume you're in the USA. Consider NPR.org for fact based journalism with objective analysis. They have the highest journalistic standards. I'm encouraged by the far right calling them woke or biased and the far left calling them "mainstream media" (used as an insult) and accusing them of not covering what's "really happening".
Why don'tcha doomscroll some history. Particularly history where nazism was overcome by the allies, or where people trapped in religious theocracies were set free.
Also crazy thought: DO something about it.
Both are much easier if you have an RSS feed setup, though I think there's a need for better filtering and self hosted options. You should and can restrict to the main items of a few trusted sources, and the feed need not be addictively designed. You should also set it to pull only one or two items a day from a given source.
A few news sources that have been fine:
Our world in data (covers long term issues like poverty, disease, and climate)
Associated press (fact based and short; most other news is reposting their stuff)
The conversation (accessible articles by academics on their areas of specialty)
And I'll encourage you to find some local news outlet to follow as well. There are some good investigative local outlets, perhaps literally targeted for you, who could both use support and really help you get context.
But with RSS I think you can have a healthy relationship with more classically 'bad' news outlets. If you see who published it before the headline, you can interpret it better.
Finally, I strongly suggest a rule that if you see a headline you must read the article. Block and stop visiting places where you're only looking at the first sentence devoid of context and authorship. If you read an article and it is terribly done, really consider blocking the source. Browser extensions can help.
I prefer SAN. Particularly their Bias Breakdown episodes.
For me it’s the bias, omission of facts, and rage bait that puts me in a bad mood.
I also visit MBFC almost every morning. On Saturday's they have a quiz which can be kinda fun.
Yeah... reading Straight Arrow News and thinking it's unbiased would be a way to be more positive. Probably enjoy the news of people being deported to random counties if you read it long enough.