this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
996 points (99.3% liked)

News

35703 readers
3112 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cassanderer@thelemmy.club 270 points 4 months ago (17 children)

He is innocent, obviously a patsy when they could not find the real culprit.

The pictures from the crime scene do not match, if the eyebrows do not fit you cannot convict.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 63 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think he’s guilty and they only caught him through illegal means, and they realized they can’t reconstruct legal evidence so they have to smear him.

[–] Inaminate_Carbon_Rod@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago (2 children)

My thoughts as well.

I heard someone told the cashier where they caught him “hey that’s the CEO assassin guy, you should call it in and get the reward!”

Reeks of illegal surveillance.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 187 points 4 months ago (34 children)

Death penalty for a murder of a single persons seems harsh. I’m anti death penalty 100% of the time, though.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 122 points 4 months ago (2 children)

They want the death penalty in case other Americans get ideas. They want to make an example out of him.

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 64 points 4 months ago

It's a thin line between making an example or making a martyr of him, so the case will likely perpetually linger in limbo.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 73 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Even people who are okay with the death penalty in a moral sense should be against it for logical reasons. Once you factor in the cost of the appeals system, the cost of the drugs themselves, the cost of paying out people or families when the drugs dont work as theyre supposed to, and the cost of keeping people in prison on death row, it is infinitely more expensive than just putting someone in prison for life.

As a society, not to mention as taxpayers, we pay a huge premium to let the state exact barbaric revenge on people

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 4 months ago (5 children)

I'm okay with the death penalty in cases like treason or insurrection.

When it's clear that they committed the crimes.

In broad daylight.

For everyone to see.

On live television.

With absolutely no doubt that they are guilty.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Some governments deserve to be treasoned or insurrected.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 14 points 4 months ago

You want this administration being the arbiter of what is treason?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

I oppose the death penalty. No one has the right to take a single life, let alone the 40,000 people that Brian Robert Thompson murdered in cold blood.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago (2 children)

ah I see you're still using "person" as a measurement unit instead of the more modern "net worth"

[–] hayvan@feddit.nl 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Am I the only one to find the phrase "net worth" disgusting? It should be "net wealth" or something.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)
[–] selkiesidhe@sh.itjust.works 125 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Luigi shouldn't be in jail at all. He was just looking out for several million of his friends.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 108 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not to mention that he clearly isn't the shooter.

[–] m4xie@lemmy.ca 29 points 4 months ago (2 children)

That was someone with very different eyebrows. The only thing we know about his appearance.

[–] Wolf@lemmy.today 20 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

It couldn't have been him, Luigi and I were fishing that day all day long. We both wept when we heard the news.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 95 points 4 months ago

He should be released and compensated for the time he spent behind bars. He is innocent.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 90 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Everyone say it with me, "Luigi Mangione is an innocent man being framed by the government because they were unable to find the real culprit."

#free Luigi

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 14 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I'm really not convinced that's the case. Either way I want him to walk free. Killing the CEO was the morally right thing to do. That CEO has been part of the system that has murdered thousands/millions out of pure greed.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 56 points 4 months ago (2 children)

We need a new US monument/shrine where we can pilgrimage to and make an offering to the god of incompetence (which one is that again?) for smiling kindly upon us. It feels wrong to be relying so solely on the power of one god here without offering up any kind of gift in thanks.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 47 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Random, but at this point why not claim he was trying to kill leftists, at which point Trump would forgive him?

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 54 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 28 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The CEO said mean things about Charlie Kirk.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] maxxadrenaline@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago (4 children)

If I were on the Jury hes innocent. My grandma died from a bad premium.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago

Is it just me, or do all the new news pics of Luigi look less... Pro-Luigi?

[–] ComradeRachel@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 4 months ago

Honestly the death penalty is cruel. The government should not be executing people.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago

Mostly he'll avoid the death penalty because he didn't do it. Trump's comments just make it a bit easier.

[–] unconsequential@slrpnk.net 20 points 4 months ago

Great work Trump! … eww… that felt weird.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 17 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Where are all the "jury nullification" comments?

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

[Jury Nullification Comment]

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 months ago

The judge ordered the DOJ prosecutors to file a response by Oct. 3 that included “a sworn declaration from a person of suitable authority…that explains to the Court how these violations occurred, despite the Court’s April 25 Order, and what steps are being taken to ensure that no future violations occur.”

The order further required the prosecutors “to advise the Deputy Attorney General, for dissemination within the Department as appropriate, that future violations may result in sanctions, which could include personal financial penalties, contempt of court findings, or relief specific to the prosecution of this matter,” and to include “confirmation that this message has been conveyed to the Deputy Attorney General” in the sworn declaration due Oct. 3.

Garnett concluded by stating that she “will consider” the statements by DOJ employees cited in the defense letter as part of the defense’s motion to strike the death penalty, spelling out a potentially very real consequence for a Trump administration that has aggressively agitated for severe consequences for Thompson’s murder.

load more comments
view more: next ›