this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2025
107 points (99.1% liked)

Privacy

2932 readers
388 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] individual@toast.ooo 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

this would destroy cyber security in-general, and essentially all companies along with it.

How would this work?

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Corporate VPNs would be allowed presumably.

[–] individual@toast.ooo 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

doesn't look like its written that way

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Eh you made me read it now. It's not super clearly written but it does sound to me like it is only services that are designed to circumvent the moralising that are prohibited. It's a little ambiguous though.

The more interesting thing I learned from reading it is that it isn't just about banning porn. It's also about banning the depiction of trans people - even descriptions! Insane. Come on America.

[–] individual@toast.ooo 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

yeah, I mean the whole point is to be able to control people. 'Design' and 'adult content' have nothing to do with it.

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

"designed to" is in the text of the law. But it's not clearly written.

[–] GasMaskedLunatic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

There's no way that this passes. Even if it did, the Governor (D) would never sign it. If she did, the Democratic party would crucify her. Don't worry about the bill, focus on the piece of shit fascist (Josh Schriver) that wasted tax-payer dollars to introduce the bill.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 7 points 2 months ago

I'd love to think you're right but there are bills in blue states for age verification too. It's nice to think that partisan politics will kill it in Michigan...and maybe it will but this is so much more than a one party problem IMO. Both parties seem complicit.

[–] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Whitmer is only governor through 2026. Dems still have their primaries to rally behind a candidate, and Detroit's mayor, Dan Gilbert, is running independent.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 9 points 2 months ago

Michiganders, please🙏 don't give them this inch. Don't even entertain them.

[–] tama@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 months ago (4 children)

What's the solution for this? Tor?

[–] GasMaskedLunatic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 months ago

That would be the peaceful solution, yes.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

My fear is that even Tor won't help, if every exit node is censored then where do you go? Also it's not like you can't fairly easily detect exits. Sure hidden services are exempt but the amount of services there are tiny compared to the internet. I really feel like we as the citizens have to convince the governments to not do this. Otherwise things will only get worse.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

it will never pass in a million years, relax

[–] Fecundpossum@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Nope, but it’s definitely a test run for when dems don’t control the state.

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You say that but uh, have you looked around recently? I mean, I don't think it'll pass either... But way dumber shit has happened in the last 9 months

[–] refalo@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

What similarly draconian laws have actually passed in recent time?