Privacy

2936 readers

316 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

danielintempesta@programming.dev

107

VPN usage at risk in Michigan under new proposed adult content law (www.techradar.com)

submitted 2 months ago by Blaze@piefed.zip to c/privacy@programming.dev

18 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Corporate VPNs would be allowed presumably.

[–] individual@toast.ooo 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

doesn't look like its written that way

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Eh you made me read it now. It's not super clearly written but it does sound to me like it is only services that are designed to circumvent the moralising that are prohibited. It's a little ambiguous though.

The more interesting thing I learned from reading it is that it isn't just about banning porn. It's also about banning the depiction of trans people - even descriptions! Insane. Come on America.

[–] individual@toast.ooo 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

yeah, I mean the whole point is to be able to control people. 'Design' and 'adult content' have nothing to do with it.

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

"designed to" is in the text of the law. But it's not clearly written.