this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
439 points (99.8% liked)

pics

25766 readers
575 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 42 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Its a good change, but these pictures man......having HDR and saturation dialled to 100 in the lower picture is unnecessary.

[–] thomas@feddit.uk 21 points 2 months ago

I think the first pic is from good street view. The second could well be default settings on whatever the camera model was.

[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There are no HDR haloes and the saturation is only high in the greens. I think you're just comparing two pictures, one of which has bright green in and feeling weird about it.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sky is roughly the same value, buildings are way brighter in the bottom image.

[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The top image is a sunny day; the bottom is cloudy. (Look at the shadows). The exposure in the bottom image is much brighter - you can also see this from the appearance of the building on the left - dark in the top image, light in the bottom image.

This has nothing to do with pushing saturation; it's just a different (better) exposed photo. People throw terms like saturation and HDR around willy nilly.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fair enough! I just saw the differences and commented without thinking.

[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago
[–] Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago

Potential a different time of day too

[–] Kenny2999@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Oversaturated greenery with grey concrete makes it kinda post apocalyptic. I.e. typical London.

[–] thomas@feddit.uk 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wandered down there just the other week, probably hadn’t been there since Covid and man, if there was ever a living, breathing reason to pedestrianise central London much as possible, this is it. It is really serene, relaxing and a pleasant spot to be.

It used to be one of those places you’d only walk past if you **had to **.

Superb stuff!

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 months ago

did you πŸ’₯ have a 🎡banana🎡?

Thank you, fucking thank you!

[–] youngalfred@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] thomas@feddit.uk 4 points 2 months ago

Bottom image is 2025