this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025
259 points (99.6% liked)

United States | News & Politics

4145 readers
304 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No pics of text

Memes are now allowed, as long as they're US centric, general political memes please see !politicalmemes@lemmy.ca

Post news related to the United States.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Recording on-duty law enforcement agents is protected by the First Amendment.

all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TuffNutzes@lemmy.world 68 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Just like running away from them and blocking their violent blows is "assaulting a federal officer".

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 41 points 10 months ago

Nazis are going to nazi

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 66 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Identify them all.

Publish at a time of your choosing.

Like after the regime falls, and the nazi hunting starts.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Data hoarders gonna be working overtime stockpiling evidence.

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

I mentioned it in previous discussions, but the least stupid of the ICE bunch should be collecting dirt on their Korpsbruders.

Might come in handy for plea bargaining 8n the future.

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Right? This just makes me want to start stockpiling. I’m not even a data hoarder or expert tracker, I just happen to have 8TB of disk space.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

aw fuck i need to get another hard drive before tariffs fuck that up worse

[–] ChokingHazard@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No expectation of privacy in public. And with scotus rulings no constitutional right to privacy either…

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Don't worry, they'll find some way to ignore their own precedent.

[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This is not China, there are rules, and if you are not going to follow them, the people will force you to. Your identification does not get to remain hidden.

[–] WhyDoYouPersist@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I feel like the more small shit they penalize their citizens for, the more just doing large shit makes sense.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

always give your enemy a way out, because if you don't....bad shit happens.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

I thought they themselves were embedding "reporters" within the ICE squads?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Who in DHS says this? We need names, people! And home addresses! And any known allergies.

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago
[–] Ascrod@midwest.social 11 points 10 months ago

Surveillance state masters don't like when surveillance is used on them. Boo fucking hoo, drink your medicine.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 9 points 10 months ago

The ONLY Reason innocent charlie KIrk was MURDERED was because he was being dOXXED!

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

you can't "doxx" public servants. being able to identify public servants (especially ones with authority to arrest or bear extraordinary force against their fellow citizens) is kind of important. my wife is a mere teacher and you can fucking look up how much she's paid by the district online. we don't even get that much privacy, all because she's a public employee. it's the tradeoff. every public employee, it's up there if you know where to look.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 4 points 10 months ago

Recording on-duty law enforcement agents is protected by the First Amendment.

*was