this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

Data is Beautiful

1765 readers
188 users here now

Be respectful

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's crazy when you think about the whole supply chain: preparing the soil, ploughing, applying fertilisers, applying pesticides, harvesting, processing, transporting, and then you just chuck it out and each step of production had its footprint.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's crazy when you think about the whole supply chain: preparing the soil, ploughing, applying fertilisers, applying pesticides, harvesting, processing, transporting

It's also crazy how efficient modern agriculture must be to do all these things and get affordable products in the end

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

efficiency ≠ price

you've glossed over a lot of economics. Like, for one thing, the EU gives about €55 billion in agricultural subsidies a year.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago

Cost of production puts a lower bound on the price. In case of competitive industries, price floats just above that limit

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How much is this percentage wise?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

NPR/USDA estimate that adults eat about 2000 pounds of food per year, so 94kg/2000 pounds = 10%. 73 kg/2000 pounds = 8%. Not bad, honestly, considering, for example, a banana peel is 12% of the banana.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago

So if they've shown percentage the numbers wouldn't really fit the agenda. Biased article is biased