this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2025
120 points (97.6% liked)

News

33367 readers
2554 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

*Their bids were so much lower than competitors, they received just 8% of the state’s $826 million in federal BEAD funding. The state awarded just over half of its federal funds. *

Satellite internet companies dominated Colorado’s revised broadband plan that aims to finally get the rest of the state’s households online and up to modern-day internet speeds, the Colorado Broadband Office announced late Friday.

Amazon’s upcoming Project Kuiper and Space X’s Starlink satellite services bid on pretty much every eligible location for a chance to qualify for some part of the state’s $826.5 million allocation as part of the federal Broadband, Equity, Access and Deployment, or BEAD program.

The LEOs, short for low earth orbit services, won 50% of the state’s approximately 90,000 eligible locations of homes and buildings deemed to have no internet or subpar speeds of less than 100 mbps down, and 20 mbps up.

Public comments on the preliminary winners will be accepted until Aug. 29 at 11:59 p.m. After that, the state sends its final plan off to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration by Sept. 4. They’ll have 90 days to review and approve plans.

“I want to celebrate being able to serve more locations with BEAD funding,” said Brandy Reitter, executive director of the Colorado Broadband Office. “Amazon is now part of our broadband ecosystem and we’ll welcome them. … I think Amazon has a lot to prove so I’m looking forward to them delivering on their commitment.”

Originally, the $42 billion BEAD program, which Congress approved in 2021 as part of the Infrastructure Act, prioritized fiber technology because many considered it to be the fastest and most future proof. But it is also the most expensive.

In June, the Trump administration made every state and territory redo their BEAD programs, even in cases where awards were already announced to internet providers. States had to keep technology neutral and pick the lowest cost options.

The LEOs were primarily picked because they could do it much cheaper than everyone else, Reitter said.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 37 points 3 months ago (2 children)

How about, let’s nationalize all utilities

[–] skip0110@lemmy.zip 29 points 3 months ago

Community owned, not nationalized.

I’m very happy with my community owned ISP (fiber to every house in my town)

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

We just did, you're now required to have Star link Internet as the criteria for what the government support has beEn rewritten so only satillite service can qualify. Elon musk now owns your connection to the world. You may experience difficulty connecting to some web domains and your homepage has been preselected for you. Your monthly history will be reviewed and unpatriotic web usage will result in detainment or deportation.

Congratulations on your Freedom!

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Verizon and Comcast clearly aren't doing it, so, Starlink it is!

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Just don't transmit anything on them against Musk/Bezos or their corporations or their actions or their speech and you'll be fine.

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com -5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Publically funded internet has worked so well in the past…

[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

Legitimately, yes, when it's not being hamstrung by anticompetitive lawsuits from Telco lobbyists.

[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Could not disagree more. I beg you to find a community in CO that doesn't love their public ISP.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (3 children)

CO is probably the right place for LEO internet. Difficult to bury, difficult to string poles, difficult to build terrestrial wireless due to various issues including no LOS.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Depends. Colorado has half a state of flat plains, then some mountain ranges, high plains, some mountain ranges, and some desert. Cities and towns are cities and towns. In any given area, they already have utilities strung for power, phone, cable. They're just cities and towns. The front range is just big cities and highways like anywhere. Several cities in the state have muni fiber. (AT&T cellular is terrible universally though. Somehow Verizon and even T-Mobile work better.)

Satellite makes sense for those people in rural homes on mountains that no longer can purchase homeowners insurance in many areas because climate change fire risk is too great. So limited market. But, they could also just beam a 2Gbps P2P radio link from a town with fiber because line of sight from a mountain is forever, so...

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

LOS is hard when there are trees. Not as hard when you just need to point straight up.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago

Last part is kinda my point. Wouldn't it be cheaper and better to just do wireless ground connection?

[–] manxu@piefed.social 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Geographically, absolutely true. The real question is what the Terms of Service will look like, and if oversight is going to be strong enough. LEO satellites are only the most economical solution if the provider doesn't artificially inflate prices.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Given LEO stuff have recurring costs every X years they need to be relaunched, I'd hope it would have rules like, you need to maintain it for 50 years or some long time frame.

It's cool if they win some money and putting new satellites up is part of the ongoing funding, but I don't want them getting another award 5 years from now for the same spot, given fiber wouldn't.

[–] manxu@piefed.social 1 points 3 months ago

I hadn't even thought of that. I was more concerned about them offering a basic slow tier that is "up to 100 Mbps" but is really dial up speed, or getting sites and services to fork over money for preferential treatment.

They found a way to get landline fiberoptic to work.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Inb4 they pretty much don't do a fucking thing, and we start seeing commercials and public perception about how bad and fake this whole "government internet" thing is

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Isn’t part of the plan to get Starkink everywhere possible so they can throttle information or cut it off? More control essentially and more money for the nazi muskrat.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Maybe in other countries, but in the USA they could just cut the fiber off as well.

Not sure how relevant that risk is inside America.