this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
37 points (97.4% liked)

News

36354 readers
2687 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] riskable@programming.dev 14 points 6 months ago (2 children)

So let me get this straight: Nebraska has been leading the fight... In increasing air pollution.

This guy is proud of this‽

...but I get it: Where does it end? All these pollution controls‽ If we take this all the way to its logical conclusion, trucks will all be electric—emitting zero pollution—and then what will Nebraska do?

Wait: I still don't get it.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

To be fair to him, trucks CAN run on corn-based fuel, which is heavily subsidized and a major crop in Nebraska. Take away that revenue source for a major employer in his state, and then what will they do?

I mean, they could use all the land they have to create green energy with wind, sun, hydro, geothermal, or nuclear and then sell that energy to bigger states that is "sent" via the massive electrical grid enhancement designed to do just that and started under Biden... Oh, wait, Nebraska voted for Trump who just killed that project.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

How does he even have standing to block California emissions regulations? Nebraska can choose to follow the more lax federal rules.

And this is not just California. Like 40% of the population has chosen California emissions rules as our only allowed choice over the lax federal rules. What happened to our “states rights”? I’m already frustrated that Teslas first round of announced public Megacharger stations for trucks don’t include any here

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Isn't it fun to live in that alternative reality where climate protection is somehow, magically hurting those people (poor and rural) that actually are and will continue to majorily pay the costs of damages from climate change?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

More money for education is sonehow magically hurting those people (poor and rural) that most need it, that would most benefit it, in the very regions whose economy most needs that kick

[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Is it Nebraska that is going bankrupt? They really seem to be crushing it lately.

[–] STROHminator@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It really appears he is not that intelligent, where he easily confuses defiance and resilance, by definition.