this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2025
25 points (93.1% liked)

Programming

23580 readers
75 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aion@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Am I missing something or is Recto still inherently linear? Flow control still goes one direction through the rectangles, where as the other 2D languages he points out, Befunge, Fish, and Piet, flow control can change directions. In later versions of Befunge it isn't even limited to 2D or moving in cardinal directions.

[–] Trail@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Yeah I don't really get it either. Even the last picture in the original article, showing a bunch of for loops, is practically one-dimensional. So I don't get the prime benefit of the idea, to be honest.

[–] hades@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

imagine the diffs

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

When you consider what truly defines a language in the modern world, only two criteria stand out:

  1. Understandable — it must carry meaning for both humans and machines.
  2. Generable — it must be producible by both humans and machines.

Well, this fails on both counts. That syntax is awful even for the trivial examples provided.