this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

News

30935 readers
2744 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

First of all, I'm not at all against medical (or recreational for that matter) marijuana. It helps people, and those people should have access to medications that help them, and I'd rather have the current system than no access to medical marijuana at all. I feel like I need to start off with this because otherwise I feel like parts of this comment may come off as anti-marijuana, and that's not my intention at all.

But it's always been kind of wild to me how the programs we have are handling medical marijuana, I'm pretty sure if a doctor tried to handle any other medication like we usually handle medical marijuana, he'd lose his license.

Marijuana isn't one drug, it's several, THC, CBD, Terpenes, various other cannabinoids and other active ingredients, all with different interactions with your body and with each other that can produce a variety of effects on their own or in combination with the others.

And often you're given little to no medical guidance on which ones will actually help with which issues, how much or how often you should take them, and in what way.

It's kind of like being given a bucket of assorted pills that may or may not help your condition and being told to mix and match them and try taking them in various ways until you feel better.

And don't even get me started on smoking it. Yes, it can be an effective delivery method, and you can go back and forth on how marijuana smoke is more or less harmful in various ways than tobacco, but at the end of the day putting smoke in your lungs is bad for you, and I don't think there's a doctor in the world who would disagree with that. If nicotine was some sort of wonder drug that could help with various conditions and you could get a prescription for it, I guarantee you it wouldn't come in the form of tobacco, you'd get pills, patches, maybe some kind of inhaler, vape or nebulizer, injections, suppositories, etc. some sort of purified product with a known dosage.

It's practically impossible to really do medical grade QA on a plant, there's going to be variation from one plant to another, or even from different parts of the same plant depending on weather, light, water, fertilizer, and other variables in the growing conditions, not to mention just the genetic variations in the plants, and knowing exactly how much of which active ingredients are in the product is kind of key to being able to dial in what is an effective dose.

Yes, a lot of that has to do with all of the shitty laws and regulations we have around marijuana and our broken medical system in general, I'm not going to go into that too much because this comment is already going to be long enough that a lot of people won't read it, but I'll leave it it's hard to study marijuana to figure what works and how, and it's hard to build up the kind of industry needed to make actual pure and consistent medical grade marijuana products.

Now of course, if we handled medical marijuana the way it probably should be for the best results, it would probably turn out to be a hugely expensive undertaking under our current healthcare system. There'd probably be a lot of doctor-patient interaction to help you dial in your dosages, with more guidance on how and when to take it, we'd probably be getting into territory where you'd need some sort of a compounding pharmacist who could provide you with a custom blend of the right active ingredients in precise ratios in the delivery method that's most effective for your condition and needs, there'd be a huge pharmaceutical industry (and probably all of the corporate greed that goes with it) that would need to be built to provide these medications, etc.

And unless we have some major overhaul to our healthcare system, that would all probably price a lot of patients out of being able to afford these treatments.

And yes, the current system works well enough for a lot of people, but it's possible that it could work even better for them and for even more people if we treated marijuana more like other medications.

I don't exactly have a grand plan on how to fix things. I don't want to make marijuana more expensive or inaccessible for the people who need it. I don't want to feed into the pockets of big pharma. But I do want to make sure that our treatments are as effective as possible, that we're treating marijuana seriously as a medication and that people view it as such, and that we're not just settling for our treatment options being "good enough" when we can do even better. We didn't stop at willow bark, we built on it to develop modern aspirin and other NSAIDs, and someday we will probably do the same for marijuana, there will probably come a day when almost no one will turn to plant-derived marijuana products for medical reasons because we will have long since isolated, synthesized, and developed entirely new classes of drugs based on what we learn from studying marijuana that do the same things more effectively, more safely, and with even less side-effects.

[–] skulblaka@startrek.website 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If we had an appropriate scheduling for it so that it could be properly researched and manufactured we could just treat it like every other plant-based medicine we have (of which there are VERY many) - isolate and extract the compounds you're interested in and recombine them in a pill or gel or aerosol form. Making supplements or tinctures or whatever, from cannabis, wouldn't be any more difficult than creating aspirin from willow. The only reason it's difficult is because it's so highly scheduled that nobody is allowed to work with it.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Op is a moron. Any decent bud tender can tell u exactly what that bud will do for you and if you get it wrong? Oh no nothing really catastrophic happens except u may get paranoid.

Ok now try that with any pill...oh ur dead? Yeah...

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a plant. Plants should be legal to grow. Maybe sometimes you will have to take steps if you want to grow it and it's an invasive plant, but it's still a fucking plant.

I use cannabis medicinally, and it's true that I would prefer to vaporize it (I don't smoke) when I use it than take some sort of pill. Because it gives me very fast pain relief. I'm sure if inhaling ibuprofen worked much faster than taking a pill, people would do that too.

[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I also smoke it (I don't vaporize) medicinally for my leg and I can go from "literally can't stand up" to "pretty much fine" in like 4 tokes, it's amazing 👍

But one of the side effects I've been experiencing lately is that I'm always having a great time, which some people really seem to have a problem with 🤔 I can't figure it out.

I can't help but say commodity cannabis ruined weed though. Dudes should be growing it in their back yards and sharing it freely with their dawgs, not paying $300 an ounce at a dispensary that feels like the DMV. The cannabis industry MUST be deregulated.

[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

the point of dispensaries is to not have a product grown in a backyard that is lab tested

does anyone here not remember the before times?

also would you buy your lettuce from Earl on the corner or from the store?

what is the quality of the soil in these backyards

https://now.tufts.edu/2019/05/29/backyard-chickens-and-risk-lead-exposure

[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

the whole point of the FDA taking over cannabis is the same as nicotine vaping

shut down the industry with over regulation that sounds positive on the surface

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If that was their goal with vaping, it's been a spectacular failure. So I say they should go for it.

[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

no it has not been a failure

the government was able to shut down most of the vape companies

some of them were very up to code being made in clean rooms good enough to make pharmaceuticals

now we have big tobacco vapes mixed in with shoddy products

have you talked to industry leaders such as business owners of some of these vape companies?

nicotine and cannabis industry is in shambles due to bad policies and laws

no wonder look at the right leaning conservatives that keep getting voted in with the latest one having a prosecutor as a vice

cannabis being rescheduled and not legalized is a trojan horse designed to make the people feel complacent and happy with only extreme regulation and the disappearance of sustainable, innovative products being the end result