this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
36 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

72895 readers
2238 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know someone who just got hired at an unfinished Meta data center, ostensibly to do some low-level hardware monitoring and maintenance. His boss admitted that he accidentally hired people a couple months too early, so the first couple weeks have consisted of sitting around, eating free food and playing mobile games. Next week they're being flown to an active data center out of state, but they won't have much of their own work to do for another 4-6 weeks.

So these guys are being paid $25/hr, 40hrs a week, with a free lunch, and making no money for the company. I would expect any other company to find this unacceptable, but it's just a drop in the bucket for Meta.

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Are they a contractor? $25/hr ~$50k seems quite low when Meta’s median salary is like $400k.

[–] etherphon@piefed.world 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fuck silicon valley for putting the wants of the few ahead of the needs of the many. What a tremendous waste of money.

[–] karpintero@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

And energy. And water. And land. The list goes on and on.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The planet is dying, we have pretty much given up on even pretending to do anything about it, and the rich are using the time we have left before mass die offs to get AI up and running early enough to perfect it.

Just a thought that occurred to me today. In better times I would dismiss it as nothing more than an amusing conspiracy theory but lately…

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I do not understand what the hell the AI is supposed to even do. Like great okay so let's say they get to the point that it's trained and can do the job of a human then what. If you replace everyone with AI then no one will have any jobs and no one will have any money so who are the AI businesses going to sell products too?

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago

The end game doesn't involve having customers at all. The rich think they just wont need an economy anymore once their slaves die off and automation and AI replace them all.

They wont be able to help themselves though. They will get bored and start eating eachother.

[–] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Burn, planet, burn.

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Are there any holes in the business plan that involves converting a dying social media platform thats already flooded with bots, troll farms and AI accounts into an entirely autonomous, isolated chamber of AI accounts, troll farm accounts and targeted ads? Zuck still fucks because of how horrible corporations are at applying KPI's that show accurate ROIs between different advertising platforms. They have no clue if their ad blitz on Twitter was more successful than the investment in YouTube ads or if it was all a result of the current state of the economy at any point in time. It would take decades before the corporate whores finally pulled enough ads for Zuck to lose a buck. Im thinking Enron style minus the investing all employee retirements fraud.

[–] Gumus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 12 hours ago

What do you mean "dying"? Facebook and Instagram are absolutely the dominant social networks / apps in most of the world. Sure there are insane amounts of bots, trolls, scammers and manipulators, but that doesn't make a platform "dying" while billions of people still use it.

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Y'know if I was the exec of a bloodsucking electricity company, I'd be explicitly putting something in my terms and conditions that commercial AI data-centre use of my company's supply is to be charged double or triple, and that undeclared use will be subject to heavy legal repercussions and surcharges.

There has to already be precedent for specific commercial uses of resources being treated differently from others. And if not, commercial versus non-commercial use may be a close enough precedent.

Likewise, if I'm the oil company or builder of power plants, generators and the like, I'd be putting a similar clause in.

This would then be one of those situations where desires align, however different the goals.

Electricity companies already do this with demand charges and peak-usage pricing for commercial customers, and many utilities are actually starting to implement AI-specific surcharges because of the insane power density these facilities use (like 5-10x more per square foot than tradtional data centers).

[–] banditoitaliano@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Nah, my local bloodsucking electricity monopoly (SE Wisconsin) will be charging the new datacenters the lowest possible per kWh rate, and due to the huge expected demand just got approval to build new natural gas power plants that ALL of us government mandated customers get to pay for.

You know, for the demand that would never exist if we weren’t subsidizing the brand new datacenters.

It’s a complete scam.