this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Coffee

9102 readers
37 users here now

☕ - The hot beverage that powers the world!

Coffee gadgets - It's always great to learn about new gadgets. Please share your favorite hardware or full setups. It might inspire newcomers to experiment!

Local businesses - Please promote your local businesses. If you are not the owner of the business you are promoting, kindly ask the owner if it's okay. It would be great if the business has a physical store to include an exterior or interior shot.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If you search YouTube for V60 brewing videos and guides you'll find about three billion different ones. Some with agitation, some without; pouring fast, in the middle, making circles; 40-60 or 30-70 or whatnot.

I always think to myself that they're mostly just fluff.

It all depends on grind size and temperature. Doesn't matter how you pour (well, within limits I would think) as long as you get your temps and grind right for the pouring technique you've chosen.

Admittedly, I haven't tried a ton of different ones, maybe three or four. But this is the feeling what I've got.

Maybe there are some edge cases, like Ethiopian coffees being more prone to clogging the filter so less agitation might be a good idea.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All I know is I have yet to get a consistent cup of coffee. Thought moving from ground to whole bean would help, then from drip to pour over. From manual grinder to electric. With all other variables the same, I still have not been able to make a consistent cup. Getting rid of fines has made the biggest impact on consistency, how I have poured, in my opinion, has made the least.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

It’s easier to be more consistent with a immersion brewing method compared to percolation. The only variable in immersion brewing would be grind size and water temperature.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's all placebo effect. That James Hoffman guy is the worst. "In our taste tests..." Are your taste tests double blind? I highly doubt it.

"You gotta jiggle it three times after 36 seconds then add 13 drops of 210.3° water between the filter and the brewer. Equally spaced, of course."

The worst part is the pseudoscientific rationalization about what each step does to the final product.

"This step balances the acidity and oxygenation."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's hilariously ironic that the example you use is the one guy using actual science. The OG with a caffeine analyser, refractometer, particle size analyser and who will strap temperature and pressure probes to anything and everything to measure how they perform.

If you haven't had the opportunity to try different coffees prepared different ways, then that's unfortunate for you. If you have and you can't taste the differences, maybe that's on you? The only people I've ever met with so little ability to distinguish tastes were smokers.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I do believe blooming is good, the first pour should be gentle and get the grounds wet, and the second pour should be from higher up, to agitate the grounds. There are probably other ways to get the same results. People tend to mess around with whatever techniques they can, do something that makes a better cup, and settle on that as the way to do it. There's more than one good way.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

My go to coffee is Vietnamese coffee and if you don't bloom the grounds in the phin before filling it the coffee comes out watery and weak. I'm not even that particular about my coffee either, but blooming makes a massive difference in how coffee tastes.