this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
318 points (96.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

32988 readers
3688 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago

Bottom, these stairs have a rounded lip to make them compliant with rise over run requirements in limited space.

[–] WereCat@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago
[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Top. Stairs aren't that tall.

[–] IHawkMike@lemmy.world 23 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

While I'm not 100% certain it's not just confusing perspective, it does appear that the slope rise is shorter than the run, suggesting that this is from the top of the stairs.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 14 points 5 hours ago

Nice catch. The carpet wear corroborates this.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 26 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I think the railing gives it away.

[–] IHawkMike@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] gens@programming.dev 1 points 4 hours ago

The shadow under the matress

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Bottom. Angle isn’t right to be the top.

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

It is an ai generated image containing indicators of both perspectives to drive engagement

[–] Joeffect@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Edit: It doesn't matter, the mattress is making an impossible shape/bend... It's definitely AI generated... Even if it was two separate mattresses, it still wouldn't make sense...

[–] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 3 points 1 hour ago

Foam mattress? Broken mattress?

My mattress easily bends like that. Most modern ones do

[–] Corigan@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 hours ago

Top the railing gives it away

[–] fritobugger2017@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Plot twist: Stuck in the middle.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 108 points 12 hours ago (20 children)

bottom, as we only can see the treads not the risers (that small inset underneath a step).

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 36 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

And you can see the wear on the treads. plus the handrail mount in the top left would be at a very inconvenient height if we were looking from the bottom up

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The handrail argument doesn't make any sense. It would be at the same height regardless of direction.

[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Also, the handrail mount is sideways if we're looking down; if we're looking up, it makes sense.

[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Maybe it is a light fixture.

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

It's at the top, I have that same bannister mount, it points upwards to the banister.

The mattress is wedged at the top of the stairs thanks to its extreme springiness.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 hours ago

Some stairs don't have different looking risers, but you're still correct because you can see wear marks from steps on the carpet.

[–] YoFrodo@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

It's the top of the stairs because in the top left of thr image you can see the banister support. If the mattresses were at the bottom then the angle of that support would be different

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago

Why is no one else talking about this.

There's no debate. It's at the top of the stairs.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] joshcodes@programming.dev 15 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Thought something was weird here. The contrast and colour is making it difficult. If you turn up shadows it changes the entire feeling, including where the obvious light source is. I wouldn't expect the dark side of the mattress unless there was a bright light directly above it.

Also the banister/handrail arm wouldn't be horizontal. Most importantly, congrats, you got me invested.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

No, the light could still be above the mattress on the ceiling at the bottom of the stairwell. This proves nothing.

But, the wear on the carpet indicates to me that those are the treads, so this is taken from the top of the stairs looking down. Also, not mentioned elsewhere, there is usually a nose on the treads and the carpet would follow the nose, which can't be seen from above.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

The biggest factor IMO is something no one mentioned yet: we can only see one face of each step (either the top or the wall). If a photo is taken from the bottom, we would almost always be able to see the tops of the first few steps, which isn't visible here. If a photo is taken from the top, the walls would pretty much never be visible (if they were, you could also see the photographer's feet).

Therefore, this photo is only consistent with a photo taken from the top.

It is possible that this is an extremely long flight of stairs or that the photo was taken from a deliberately deceptive angle, but if that's the case I have to say it was expertly done, because I am CERTAIN that we are looking from the top and the mattress is at the bottom.

[–] supamanc@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Nah, the hanger for the banister is very common, it protudes from the wall and turns up into the bottom of the handrail, therfore we are looking from the bottom up.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

It's going at an angle, not up. It's 90° from the handrail itself, which is sloped to match the incline of the stairs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 29 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Bottom, we can see dust and debris accumulated on the "run" part of the steps.

[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago

And you don't see the nosing of the steps.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 42 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

I have those stairs with that carpet.

💯% this is looking down to a mattress at the bottom of the stairs.

Conclusive evidence:
Looking Down

Looking Up

(Sorry I was too lazy to get the low perspective)

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Not convinced. It's a different set of stairs and a different carpet. I have had stairs with a carpet more similar to the OP that did not have a riser. See elsewhere in these comments for a photo of these stairs, now bare. In the distant past, they were carpeted.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cooljimy84@lemmy.world 29 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

From the wear patten on the carpet I would say bottom, but the handle to the side makes me think top !....

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rotkehle@feddit.org 19 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

top. you can see part of the handrail on the top left of the picture

[–] CountVon@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 hours ago

I think that's a heavy duty banister bracket, like this one:

white heavy duty banister bracket

Some banister brackets have a swivel type arrangement so that the bracket can be vertical underneath the handrail, no matter the angle of the handrail. Basic heavy duty brackets like this one are completely fixed in orientation, so they're installed with the vertical support at an angle to support the handrail. I suspect the bracket in the photo is at a 45ish degree angle and only looks vertical due to the perspective. The banister has been deliberately cropped out of the photo to make the perspective as confusing as possible.

Personally I think the photo was taken from the top of the stairs looking down, based on the wear in the carpet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] moakley@lemmy.world 15 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Bottom.

  1. The risers on the stairs are not visible.

  2. The wear on the carpet goes right to the edge. That's consistent with people stepping on it, not kicking it on the way up.

  3. If it's at the top, the mattress doesn't appear to have any of its weight resting on a step. It could be so wedged in that it's being held in place, and that it was wedged that way by someone awkwardly pushing at the ends of it in a way that wouldn't seem to give them enough leverage to do that. But the obvious explanation is more likely, that it's at the bottom of the stairs.

[–] xylol@leminal.space 2 points 7 hours ago

If it was at the top those would be some big steps you'd have to lift your leg up over

The real question isnt "where is it" but "what bastard wants it to be anywhere else?".

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

I think it is the bottom of the top of the stairs because of the lighting to the bottom left of the mattress. That should be in shadow from the mattress if it was at the bottom of the stairs.

[–] WhyIAughta@lemmy.world 15 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

Not if the mattress is coming in from an outside door. That light could be daylight. In fact I believe this to be the case.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

We are looking down on the mattress and it is casting a shadow on the step below it. If we were looking up at the mattress it would be casting a shadow across the stairs in front of it.

[–] WhyIAughta@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Yup, I agree

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

We could be looking at the stairs from underneath.

[–] match@pawb.social 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

awh shit, i clipped through the geometry again

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] winkly@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

I’m a stairs half full kinda person

load more comments
view more: next ›