this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
632 points (99.7% liked)

Today I Learned

23244 readers
1006 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 22 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

The murder of political enemies by the Nazis is usually not considered part of the Holocaust.

The Nazis created concentration camps to detain people immediately after they assumed power. The death camps in which millions were gassed were its own thing within that system.

The detainment concentration camps were for leftists and democrats. Then also people from the margins of society. The so-called "work-shy"; meaning people who had for whatever reason troubles functioning. It would have included Hitler if he hadn't succeeded with that politics grift. Gay people, of course. Jehovah's Witnesses because they were conscientious objectors. Of course, people were tortured and maltreated in these camps, too. But how bad it was very much depended on the status of the prisoner.

The first Holocaust killings are usually said to be the hospital patients who were victims of the Aktion T4 in September 1939 when the war started. Disabled people who needed care were murdered to free up resources for the war effort. One method was locking them in an idling truck and suffocating them with exhaust fumes.

[–] Headofthebored@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

One method was locking them in an idling truck and suffocating them with exhaust.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_van

[–] 58008@lemmy.world 61 points 6 hours ago (9 children)

I've been reading about the Holocaust a fair bit of late, and it's interesting to see the debate around the functionalist/intentionalist view of how it happened. OP's story seems to lend credence to the former version, in that the Nazi state was a patchwork of warring factions that were each trying to take power for themselves and in an effort to do so, tried a little too hard to do what they imagined Hitler wanted of them, namely more and more murder and ruthlessness and general mayhem, eventually culminating in plans for wholesale extermination. This is the functionalist view, where things happened almost in a bottom-up fashion, whereas the intentionalist idea is one where Hitler planned the Holocaust from day one in a top-down approach. I personally think it's more likely to be the former though, at least from what I've read about it anyway.

Growing up in the '80s and '90s, I never really learned much about the Holocaust aspect of WWII. I knew the broad strokes, of course, but the finer details of the Nazi state's operations are where the true horror lies. Even without WWII or the Holocaust, it was one of the purest examples of a nightmarish dystopia run by corrupt, amoral, incompetent, petty, narcissistic lunatics and sociopaths. The parallels with certain modern governments is terrifying...

[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 57 minutes ago)

Very few people understand what fascism is in the concrete day to day sense. Fascist politics are very normalized in the modern world. They obfuscate everything they do. The more they can confuse and entangle antifascists the better. While we try and deconstruct their empty statements and lies they spend the whole time making confusing and conflicting statements, trying to garner as much support from bigoted people as possible. Its a union of bigotry, greed, and manipulation.

Fascists are themselves parasitic to democracy. Their existence within democracy whatsoever steadily nurtures them. The more tolerable their ideas are the faster they will grow. Tolerating Nazis at all is the same thing as promoting them. Their ideology spreads like a virus, it doesnt try to convince you merely overwhelms you. It harkens out to the priviledged masses fear of the other, and then surrounds them in a fog of conflicting information and symbolism. It says "believe in me and I will keep you safe" before outputting a barrage of rage, hatred, disgust, fear and dread. It uses language like symbolism itself. It preoccupies itself with definitions, centralizing itself as authority over reality itself. Once someone has become a fascist it is statistically impossible to change their views. Once someone has become a fascist they are overwhelmingly likely to never change. There is no scientifically proven way to deradicalize them. That's how powerful a hold it creates. True believers in fascism exist in this perpetual state of anger and confusion. The rest see utility in fascism, to advance their bigotry or to profit off of corruption.

Fascism doesnt need to win over everyone in this manner. They know they won't. All they need is to have true legislative power for a single moment. Thats all it takes for them to end democracy. Those they cannot force to walk at the end of gun will fall victim to its bullets. Once they have power it's no longer possible to use any institutions against them. They will use militias and armies to threaten coerce and kill anyone who opposes them. All it took was one moment, one instant for democracy to die in Weimar Germany. All Hitler needed was true legislative power for one single day. Some 20-30 million people paid the price for that.

If you look at the actual election that got Hitler elected prior to his absolute rule, it was actually pretty close. He did not win by a landslide. The nazi party actually barely held on to power. Only 33% of the country voted for them in November of 1932. A third. It didnt matter though, thats all it takes. 37% collectively voted for the social democrats and the communists. Some people run afoul of claiming that Germany was in full support of the Nazis. It just isnt true. But it didn't matter. The following year they had armed SA at all the polling stations and were able to cement absolute authority over the whole country.

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I was watching the PBS American Experience episode on Nazi City, USA.

Hearing literally the same words that came out of the American Nazi party in 1930s that have been spewed by Republicans in the last 10 years was frankly TERRIFYING.

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

One of the gravest mistake we can make is to believe it can't happen here / it can't happen again.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 5 points 1 hour ago

The gravest mistake is not violently putting it down the second it sprung up.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

What is wild is that MOST people had no idea about the Holocaust as it was happening. That when we learn of WWII and all that was around it and you hear about the camps you think "no shit we went to help with that." But then find out that wasn't really a motivation for the masses is crazy.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

Governments knew, for sure the Brits.
There was a letter explaining everything.
I suspect they allowed since it served their purpose of creating israel which they were heavily involved in.
Same as the zionists who made deals with the nazis who could be taken to the camps: those that didn't want to move to israel later.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 2 points 1 hour ago

Zionists were literally engaging in terrorism against the British, some even trying to side with the Nazis (Likud predecessors) to fight Britain.

Originally Britain was going to give the land to Palestinians.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

What are you talking about? Brits may have known but they were losing until the US came to help. They had no power to stop anything at the time. And governments aren't a populace. My original statement was that the masses were not motivated by their existence. The media was newspapers and they may have small articles here and there. But it was not common knowledge that these camps even existed.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

What are you talking about?
Exactly wat I said.

they were losing until the US came to help. LOL american?
And that's besides the point.
You should work on your comprehensive reading.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

What are you talking about?
Exactly wat I said.

  • that's the problem. It doesn't make sense because English isn't your thing.

they were losing until the US came to help. LOL american?
And that's besides the point.
You should work on your comprehensive reading.

  • if you think you make more points by being snarky and trying to goad me, you don't. You just prove to me you don't have anything interesting enough to consider rational and therefore not worthy of even pondering your point.

You can't even read a statement and understand what was said. You must run stop signs and blame other cars for not paying attention.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

... isn't the functionalist (?) version more what the west/victors wrote about WWII? Not even as propaganda per se, just bcs it can be summed up in one line & afterwards easier to append propaganda for various purposes.

Clearly if Hitler planned everything that happened he would have needed to hold power for a lot longer to solidify his sole influence or have overwhelming public support (and then do all the rest).

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It was a difference between Western powers versus the Soviet Union. Western powers tried to make sure that Germans understood their complicity to genocide even if they didn't operate concentration camps. In contrast, the Soviet Union generally portrayed the problem being Hitler leading the people astray.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

That's USA vs USSR in both Germanies, right?

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

I think it starts with the person up top seeing more and more what they are able to get sway with and how little accountability there is and things just snowball from there. At any point, the dictator up top could stop things, but instead their true evil nature gets revealed.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] 2xspicy@sopuli.xyz 136 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

There’s an interesting book on this subject called Hitler’s First Victims by Timothy Ryback. It chronicles how Josef Hartinger risked his career, and even his life, in pursuing justice, suggesting that history might have taken a different course if more Germans had followed his example.

OP said he was reading the same book a minute after you. In case you are interested in chatting it up with them haha

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 130 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (32 children)

I'm currently reading Hitler's First Victims and while I knew Nazism was gaining power in the early 1930's, I didn't actually know that the systemic murder of Jews began this early, nor that anyone in the legal apparatus at the time tried to stop it, so this was heartening in a way even though they didn't ultimately succeed.

There are a lot of parallels with what's happening now under Donald Trump, particularly the intentional destruction of the rule of law, which made the establishment of Dachau and the ~~kidnapping~~ indefinite imprisonment and murder of Jewish political prisoners possible.

[–] match@pawb.social 5 points 4 hours ago

I'm sick of parallels, when are we gonna do orthogonals

[–] londos@lemmy.world 13 points 6 hours ago

I also recommend In the Garden of Beasts, by Erik Larson. It follows the US ambassador to Germany in the 30s and how he tries to warn his counterparts back home how bad things are getting. Again, many parallels.

[–] Arsecroft@lemmy.sdf.org 32 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Another great book about the actual process of the holocaust is IBM and the Holocaust. Lots of detail about how the victims were targetted and then how IT really made a lot of the horrors possible

Recommended read for anyone curious about the logistics.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Been thinking about that one with the AI fun they're building now. If you think IBM helped the holocaust, just wait till you see what ChatGPT can do. It's going to be like thought police.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 2 points 3 hours ago

Look up Palantir

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] einkorn@feddit.org 30 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

One of the most well know and influential anti Nazi songs of the era The Peat Bog Soldiers was composed in 1933 as well.

Even years before the outbreak of war in Europe these camps had already had a storied history.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I'm an old musician, who remembers the role that musicians played in the Vietnam War Resistance. The current population music industry would never allow their artists to be so openly resistant today.

So I've been looking for music to revive, and create a soundtrack for the growing resistance. This might be a good one.

It's also time to revive all those good old protest folk songs by Woody Guthrie and the like. Songs like This Land Is Your Land.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

The current population music industry would never allow their artists to be so openly resistant today.

Bands like Rise Against and System of a Down got a lot of air time around the Iraq war, and could go back to 90s with Rage against the Machine and the late punk bands - but I've definitely precieved an industry shift towards promoting music that celebrates apathy and embracing futility in recent years.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 24 points 8 hours ago (5 children)

When the killing starts here in the states, the media will just report on basketball and celebrities.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

Swan Lake 2: 'Murica Boogaloo

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

The revolution will not be televised

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›