this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
66 points (94.6% liked)

PC Gaming

11592 readers
624 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca
UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
66
The Radeon RX 9070 XT is Now Faster, AMD FineWine (i.ytimg.com)
submitted 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) by recursive_recursion@piefed.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

TL;DW:
[1440p Average] "So across 16 games tested, the 9070 XT saw on average a 9% improvement with the latest game and driver updates. In comparison the 5070 Ti saw just a 2½% improvement."

  • Steve Walton from Hardware Unboxed.

4K results shows the 5070 Ti and the 9070 XT performance matching neck and neck.

  1. On review day the 5070 Ti was 2% faster, but now the 9070 XT is 3% faster than the 5070 Ti.
  2. With the 9070 XT being $150 CAD or ~30% cheaper (in US and AU) than the 5070 Ti, the 9070 XT wins out in being the better value buy.
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Hmm. I gotta say, I got alarm bells going off in my head as soon as I saw the charts at 2:57 and 3:02. All four tests came out exactly the same in both trials? Not a single frame of difference for 1% lows or the average? I wouldn't expect results that consistent if they were run back to back, let alone months apart on new drivers...

Oh lord, 3:27 is even more suspect. The 5070 gets the exact same result twice, but then the 9070's updates make it also exactly the same??? aint no way chief

[–] darcmage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Is that based on the assumption that the numbers come from single runs instead of averages of multiple runs?

[–] BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I don't see the number of runs stated anywhere. Still would be pretty unlikely to get the exact same results, and even more still for a 9070 to perform exactly the same as a 5070

[–] darcmage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

So HU are fudging the numbers to favor ....?

[–] BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca 1 points 10 hours ago

I'm not making any claims except that these first several results look extremely suspect

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 19 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

9% is significant

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 23 points 17 hours ago

That's a generational upgrade according to some companies these days.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Wonder if this is similarly true on Linux platforms.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 7 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

The Linux drivers were pretty buggy at launch, so probably. Every Mesa release this year has come with a ton of fixes and improvements.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

I'm seeing 9070XT at €850, while a 5070Ti is at 950. This is like, 10 - 11% cheaper?

I mean, AMD is still better value, but nowhere close to 30%