this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
206 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

3750 readers
350 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Chess "is diverse and inclusive," the German Chess Federation said in rejecting calls for a ban on trans competitors.

all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 10 points 10 hours ago

I have, and never will, understand how the fuck being trans gives you any sort of advantage in chess. Only thing I have ever rationalized about this is that the people saying it surely must be sexist cave people.

[–] LyingCake@feddit.org 10 points 11 hours ago

Just that everybody is aware about the scope/cultural relevance of this story. Apollo News, the original German source, is not a respectable news outlet.

It's an online publication more similar to a blog in many ways. The founders call themselves 'an alternative to the leftwing mainstream' and are not afraid to show their allegiance to the far right, regulary disseminating actual fake news or using slurs against immigrants and lgbt people. For american readers, I'd compare this to Breitbart.

When googling stuff along the lines of "chess trans-athlete championship" in German, this story does not come up at all. The German mainstream is gladly not (yet) interested in this culture war.

[–] FriendlyN3rd@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

they prob cry over a trans person winning uno

[–] Nyadia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 hours ago

Trans elder's bingo win in local nursing home prompts backlash

[–] Green_Mouse@piefed.social 62 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

cisgender women players were considering quitting, fearing unfair competition

An unfair competition... in a damn chess game?! WHAT?!

[–] florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 17 hours ago

I'm tired boss

[–] Commiunism@beehaw.org 19 points 20 hours ago

Chess “is diverse and inclusive,” the German Chess Federation said

Lol, lmao even. It's one of the more sexist sports there are in terms of organization, often marginalizing women and most of these marginalizing structures are still there to this day. This isn't to excuse anti-LGBT rhetoric, but pretending like everything is fine with chess probably doesn't help.

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 81 points 1 day ago

Why should it prompt backlash? Did they celebrate the win by knocking over their opponent's king with their cock?

These pearl clutchers make me want to force said pearls down their throat until they shit out every single bead or I can grab one end of the necklace and rip it out like a fucking BeyBlade!

[–] Tillman@lemmy.world 72 points 1 day ago (3 children)

TIL men and women don’t play int the same chess tournaments. Why? ELI5

[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 27 points 20 hours ago

There are open tournaments and women's tournaments. The open tournaments are for anyone. Women have competed in them but at the top level it is somewhat rare.

The women's tournaments are intended to provide an environment that encourages more women to play chess. There's considerable sexism among men (not only in the chess world, hah) which is not always very welcoming.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 74 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because back in the day when blatant sexism was the norm, women were excluded. Women-only tournaments were an attempt to correct that.

In a perfect world, everybody would play in the same tournaments and all genders would feel equally welcome to them, but that's not the world we live in.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 36 points 23 hours ago

back in the day

I have some bad news about the present day

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 17 points 23 hours ago

The men’s tournaments are open to everyone and women have and do compete in them.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 28 points 23 hours ago

Just when the world couldn't get stupider…

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago

The Times reports that she claimed some cisgender women players were considering quitting, fearing unfair competition

At least with the more physical sports there's a (spurious) argument about bone structure or whatever. There really isn't that same argument wrt Chess, even if it be a bit physically taxing.

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 16 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

yeah, but a BiOlOgIcAl man has a huge body advantge during chess!!!!!!!11111

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What's the excuse here? "Afab players are too stupid to face trans opponents"?

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago

Internationally, the World Chess Federation imposed a temporary ban in 2023, preventing trans women from women’s tournaments pending further review — a rule Germany opposes, pointing out that a trans woman had already claimed a national women’s title in the early 2000s, Apollo News reports.

I think this just completely took effect and was not temporary.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender_people_in_chess
https://www.bbc.com/sport/67127168

The whole thing is a shitshow, because if you are MTF , FIDE does not think you are a woman, thus can't have women's titles, but also, if you're FTM , you are ALSO not a woman, so you can't keep your women's titles (Womens' grandmaster, Womens' International Master,etc).

[–] randamumaki@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 1 day ago

Good on the German Chess Federation to not bow to pressure.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The German Chess Federation has rejected any ban

meh.

if they really cared, there would not be any official 'gendered' tournaments. but there are, because they want that for some reason.

[–] AlataOrange@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Gendered chess tournaments make a certain amount of sense. The main issues are that women are less likely to play chess due to societal and cultural factors and without their own division would have even more societal and cultural roadblocks to joining the game. This isn't touching on how getting certain titles requires winning specific events that would prove even more difficult for those same reasons.

Basically without gendered tournaments there would be even less women in chess and it would be even more of a "boys club" than it already is.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's also why the anti-trans argument makes absolutely no sense in chess. Like, in sports there's some room for nuance because cis men do have a huge advantage in most sports of cis women, and depending on the sport and the stage of transition, that can carry forward to trans women. It's fucking hard to have that nuanced conversation because 95% of the time it gets drowned out by transphobes, but there's still something to talk about.

But in chess? Nobody is arguing there's any inherent biological advantage. The only reason for gendered tournaments is to create a safer space for non-men to compete in a male-dominated pastime. The only argument for excluding trans women from the Women's category in chess is transphobia. It's a real "mask off" moment for all the TERFs claiming it's about "integrity in sport" (Jesus fuck, writing that out made me realise how similar this all is to gamergate and the birth of the alt right).

A lot of tournaments in HEMA (historical European martial arts—think fencing, but with bigger, older styles of swords than what they use at the Olympics) around where I lived have started using an "Underrepresented Genders" (URG) category alongside the Open category, instead of Women's. It's functionally not much different from having a Women's category that also accepts trans people (important possible difference: it accepts trans men as well as trans women, and enbies), but the name helps make it clearer. I quite like that as a concept.

100% this if people want you get angry at the FIDE they should do it for the right reasons.

[–] PoopingCough@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, easy fix there right? Just have a women's tournament and an everybody tournament. Women can then choose which to enter.

[–] AlataOrange@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's what we already do?

[–] PoopingCough@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Oh gotcha. Sorry I'm not the most familiar with the chess world.

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No because there are men only tournaments too, what the poster is saying is to remove men only and only have women or everybody we think.

[–] AlataOrange@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What chess tournament is men's only, I haven't heard of a single one?

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago

Okay, seems you were correct. Thanks for the correction, genuinely!

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Maybe not officially, we aren't sure (we will look this up). But there are some men who refuse to play with women.

[–] AlataOrange@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you are paired against an opponent and choose not to play against them then you get an uncontested match loss and will tank your ELO pretty quickly. This is also anecdotal but I've never met a player who would refuse an opponent of roughly equal ELO

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

Awesome, thanks for the correction!

[–] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That specific scenario wouldn't make the tournament a "men's only" tournament, it'd just mean that a bunch of sensitive weirdos are throwing a strop because a woman is in the vicinity lol

That's so mad though, are there really men who refuse to play chess with women???

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

Hmm, we could have sworn we saw something a while ago but we aren't finding anything now. Oh well shrugs.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The system only functions the way it does because the people prop it up. Any system.

[–] AlataOrange@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So instead of having a welcoming space for a historically and actively marginalized group while allowing them to still complete in every other tournament we should just what? Close women's divisions, revoke all their titles, and tell them to play "real chess" instead?

Like getting rid of women's tournaments is only a bad thing that would make the game stagnant even further to being the "boys club" game a lot of people already think it is when chess should be for everybody.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not fond of self-marginalizing. So maybe some of us are uncomfortable. Some men will be, too. Maybe individuals are capable of self-regulating if empowered to do that. I'm sure some chuds will throw a tantrum. Block and parry, so to speak.

[–] AlataOrange@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Then play in an open tournament?

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm being genially serious, find a local club and give it a try, you might find you enjoy it. Or you could try playing on chess.com for an even easier entry they also have computer opponents of various skill levels if you feel intimidated by having a human opponent to begin

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Officially there's women's and open tournaments. There isn't anything stopping the top female player, Hou Yifan from going to a tourney and potentially playing the top (general and specifically male) player Magnus Carlsen.