this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
738 points (99.5% liked)

politics

24561 readers
2727 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Move comes after rightwing Republican accuses New York City mayoral candidate of concealing support for ‘terrorism’

The Trump administration has raised the possibility of stripping Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic mayoral candidate for New York City, of his US citizenship as part of a crackdown against foreign-born citizens convicted of certain offences.

Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, appeared to pave the way for an investigation into Mamdani’s status after Andy Ogles, a rightwing Republican representative for Tennessee, called for his citizenship to be revoked on the grounds that he may have concealed his support for “terrorism” during the naturalization process.

Mamdani, 33, who was born in Uganda to ethnic Indian parents, became a US citizen in 2018 and has attracted widespread media attention – and controversy – over his vocal support for Palestinian rights.

(page 3) 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 days ago

Relax everyone, this is all a part of the democratic process.

[–] mintiefresh@piefed.ca 10 points 1 day ago

Damn they really out there brainstorming

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I feel like I remember Mrs. Trump and Mr. Musk both talking about "terrorism". I remember Mrs. Trump even had a jacket for the occasion that said "I really don't care, do you?" to flaunt her hatred for our country.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Believe the "Don't really care" jacket was for a tour of a disaster zone, or maybe one of the kids-in-cages camps.

Sounds like "terrorism" to me. Deport deport deport!

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly? Fucking do it. Piss off millions of people within earshot of DC. Let's fucking see what happens.

[–] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] dickalan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Funking it up

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Gestapo level shit. Need to rise up. No one cares anymore, and no one is willing to do what it will take.

[–] reluctant_squidd@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I’m not convinced you would need to rise up. Just collectively stop going to work. The house of cards falls pretty quickly on capitalism if there are no workers to exploit.

All the power is in the populace if they all agree to take it back together.

It’s the laziest thing a person could do really. Just stay at home, ration food and wait until the billionaire folks lose their minds.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I think a general strike would be effective, but dangerous when people are kept so close to poverty.

Remember the pandemic, we "all" stopped going into work? Except the grocery store workers, and the food processor workers, and those that distribute the food, and water treatment plant staff, and the power plant, and hospital staff, and taxis, and drug store workers, and so on and on. Do those people stop working? How many people can't obtain the things they need beyond their next paycheck? What if in addition, the store shelves are empty?

I agree, it's the most feasible way to fight back, so don't get me wrong. But just like union dues and preparation enable a local strike, accounting for food, water, amenities...a general strike would need to do that or else we would be fighting a war of attrition not just against billionaires with multi-year bunkers but also against ourselves.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›