this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
30 points (100.0% liked)

Crazy Fucking Videos

7872 readers
1 users here now

Dive into the World of Insane Videos!

Rules

  1. No hate speech of any kind.
  2. Content warnings are required in post titles where applicable. Example: [CW: Injury]
  3. Use your best judgement and mark NSFW posts as such.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

"Fuck the landing gear, fuck the prop, get on the ground!"

Damn fine job, pilot! (And I mean that in all seriousness. Landing gear and prop can be replaced).

[–] RarePossum@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

Planes on the ground, pilots alive; perfect landing!

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

No joke! Looks like he was fighting a crosswind on the approach no less.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 7 points 2 years ago

I saw this on the news yesterday. It was insane. The guy who stepped out was seemed so calm.

[–] CaptainS7ark@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Amazing that such a small plane could fit the massive balls that the pilot has.

[–] rustyredox@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

From the size and proximity of the projected shadow, how close do folks think that plane buzzed over that last building?
The left wing tip, it looked less than a wing span away in hight. Yikes!

[–] fubarx@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Your basic small-engine pilot nightmare. That last big building was an extra heart-attack.

Glad they walked away safely.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

This is why I prefer small planes to huge jets. Smaller planes are more likely to become gliders if the engines break, larger ones are more likely to just become stones.

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The glide ratio of a Cessna 172 is about 9:1, video is from a T210N Centurion II, a similarly sized but heavier plane, so its gliding capabilities are worse.

The glide ratio of an Airbus A320 is 17:1.

A huge Airbus is much better at gliding than a small Cessna.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Which is better at barrel rolls?

Near the end of the flight, the aircraft was seen performing a barrel roll over Puget Sound, recovering approximately ten feet (3 m) above the water.

[–] comrade19@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You should prefer the bigger ones haha. The big planes have two engines and complete redundancy, two pilots who have more experience, turbine engines which are more reliable, better glide ratio so they can glide further, higher cruise levels so they can glide even further. I fly that plane in the video for work and I cross my fingers when we go over dense trees or water because those 1980's planes are always giving us trouble!

[–] scarilog@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Out of curiosity, what do you do for work that involves flying a light aircraft like this?

[–] gramie@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 years ago

Ultralight FTW! Some of them have a handle in the cockpit you can pull, that releases a parachute for the entire aircraft!