this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2025
179 points (98.4% liked)

politics

30994 readers
1607 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump urged Senate Republicans on Sunday to overrule the chamber’s parliamentarian in order to pass key parts of his sweeping domestic policy bill.

In a Sunday post on Truth Social, the president backed a call from Rep. Greg Steube (R-Fla.) and other GOP hard-liners to ignore rulings from Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough.

The parliamentarian is the nonpartisan Senate official responsible for determining whether parts of laws meant to be passed through budget reconciliation comply with the rules for that process.

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 1 year ago

"Not.A.King.Tho'"
--maga

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The whole system is being dismantled to the point I keep wondering when it'll suffer total structural collapse. It's less about the "doom" part than the lingering anxiety over the "impending" part.

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It probably won't collapse completely anytime soon. It'll just be warped beyond recognition while the people who are in denial fight tooth and nail to keep the system from collapsing.

All the while, this warped system will continue to benefit Trump until him or his successor gains enough power to no longer need the old system and can dismantle them completely without meaningful opposition.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

i.e. The Palpatine Method

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

You get to learn a fun new term: Cascading failures. Ooooh boy it's a good one.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 19 points 1 year ago

Trump: "Haven't you idiots learned from my example by now!? We can do WHATEVER we want! Just do it. No one will stop us! A judge intervenes, we just get another to let us do it!"

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So he is telling them to ignore the rules and do it anyway?

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Their plan is just do it whether it's legal or not, it only matters if somebody actually stops them.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it requires 60 votes to overrule the parliamentarian. They just want to make a show of it.

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Didn't take them 60 votes to ignore the parliamentarian and revoke the waivers that let California set its own emissions standards.

The Senate has overruled the guidance of the parliamentarian, a nonpartisan staffer who interprets the Senate's rules, and voted 51 to 44 to overturn a waiver allowing California to set its own air pollution standards for cars that are stricter than national regulations. The Senate has only overruled its parliamentarian a handful of times in the 90-year history of the role.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

you know the thing