Bro if your city has more homicides than car crashes you have bigger problems than traffic.
Fuck Cars
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
Then why spend more on cops than metro?
Yes, if your city has more homicides than traffic deaths, the bigger problem is—drum roll please—homicides.
But if your city has more traffic deaths than homicides, then traffic is a bigger problem than homicides. Which is the whole point of this post.
Nah. They are problems that should not be compared like that since they are fundamentally different: traffic deaths occur as a risk of travel/mobility. The underlying reason is good/ok. Murders do not have that.
Murders and traffic deaths are usually an order of magnitude or more apart.
Comparing car crashes and homicides in this way is a dishonest appeal to emotion. Click bait. Substitute homicides for shark attacks and you’ll see how dumb this article is.
@youCanCallMeDragon @SwingingTheLamp Emotion is what causes people to be more scared of violent crime than the everyday consequences of their transportation choices when cars are much more likely to injure, kill, or sicken them. Data showing how many people are killed by motorists instead of murderers is necessary to help people overcome that emotion and make decisions based on realistic risk assessment.
(Car use is violent crime)
Okay, now imagine the city spending a billion dollars a year on preventing shark attacks, and elections being decided based on the candidates shark policy.
Huh. If traffic is more likely to kill me than violent crime, it's a dishonest emotional reaction to fear traffic more than violent crime?
Yeah. Not choking on henry Ford's dick makes you a liar.
TIL
I'm shocked how many people dont know this.
but the metro is full of crazy (homeless) people
You think you have to pass a mental health test to get a license? The person driving right next to you could be having a mental breakdown and you wouldn't even know. At least if someone's yelling on the metro I can notice them and switch cars.
The metro is fine. Its full of people goong to work. Sometimes annoying teens.
Sometimes if youre on like the pink line or something at midnight, you'll find a methed up fucker with a knife. The conversation will be so dumb, but youll feel like an ass just telling him to fuck off.
Streets also have unhoused people. They tend to live there.
Aren't car crashes in top 5 of causes of death in the USA?
Don't get in a crash. You'll cause traffic to back up and that's not very considerate. Also you'll get hurt I guess.
Like people don’t realize they drive a tank..
This is clear evidence they need more guns.
I mean that's...kind of good....
Empty comment for me.