this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
758 points (96.8% liked)

memes

18163 readers
1872 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 67 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Buffalo Buffalo Buffalo Buffalo Buffalo Buffalo Buffalo or something

[–] CocaineShrimp@lemm.ee 31 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Well actually no, I only got 7/8 and didn't have the capitalization correct. But I appreciate your support, not only in tone but also in source material

[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Apparently there's nothing special about 8 buffalos; any sentence that consists solely of the word buffalo repeated is grammatically correct. Also as an idiot on this subject I can confidently tell you that as long as you throw some lowercase buffalos in there nobody is going to notice.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Struggling to see it really making sense as a sentence with more than 5. Reading the example doesn't really seem like a proper sentence either. Replacing buffalo with the 3 different meanings of the word for the full sentence doesn't really seem like a sentence. "Bison intimidate intimidate bison" specifically, why is intimidate repeated? Also why the extra "Buffalonian bison" at the start.

[(Buffalonian bison) (Buffalonian bison intimidate)] intimidate (Buffalonian bison).

At least this easily makes sense - Buffalonian bison intimidate Buffalonian bison, but that just gives you buffalo repeated 5 times.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

(Buffalonian bison) (Buffalonian bison intimidate)] intimidate (Buffalonian bison).

[(Albany cattle) (Utica bison bully)] intimidate (Syracuse oxen)

[The] Albany cattle (that Utica bison bully) intimidate Syracuse oxen.

In this sentence, "cattle" are the subject, and "oxen" are the object. The verb is "intimidate". Everything else is some form of adjective modifying "cattle" or "oxen"

We can go further:

[The] Albany Cattle (that Utica Bison bully) intimidate [the] Syracuse oxen (that Poughkeepsie yak deceive).

Cattle are still the subject; Oxen are still the object.

The cattle (which are bullied by the bison) intimidate the oxen (which are deceived by the yak)

Moving on:

[The] Albany cattle (that Utica bison [that Buffalo buffalo buffalo] bully) intimidate [the] Syracuse oxen [that Poughkeepsie yak deceive].

The cattle are still intimidating the oxen. Which cattle? The cattle that are bullied by bison. Which bison? The bison that are buffaloed by buffalo.

Which oxen? The oxen that are deceived by the yak.

The buffalo buffalo the bison; the bison bully the cattle; the cattle intimidate the oxen. Which oxen? The oxen which are deceived by the yak.

[–] SpraynardKruger@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Amazing breakdown. My brain struggles with it after 8 buffalos.

[–] owsei@programming.dev 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Buffalonian buffalo [who] Buffalonian buffalo bully, bully Buffalonian buffalo

for me splitting the groups made the sentence make sense: NJ people NY people bully, bully NY people

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 months ago

Ahh, that makes more sense now.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

You & @basis@sh.itjust.works — thank you, very nice!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BagOfHeavyStones@piefed.social 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] NooBoY@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Badger, badger, badger, badger.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 9 points 5 months ago

Snake! A snake! Oh, it's a snake!

[–] BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 48 points 5 months ago (1 children)

My favorite thing about tautologies is how tautological they are.

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Amazing; the features I like the most about the things I like are also what I like about the most about them. Truly, you and I have our similarities in common.

[–] BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

Yoy should come join the tautology club. Just remember these three rules:

  1. The first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club
  2. The second rule of tautology club is not the first rule of tautology club
  3. If this is your first night at tautology club, you haven't been here before
[–] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago (1 children)

so, whoever coined the term "coined the term", coined the term "coined the term"

even bash is more precise than human language

[–] msage@programming.dev 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

ad username: just -j8? how long does that take?

[–] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

look at you , Mister Money Bag smh

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

This why we need term limits

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Somewhere at Microsoft there is, presumably a Teams Team team.

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

I think there are like, seven of them and they don’t talk to each other.

[–] PodPerson@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 months ago
[–] levzzz@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Whoever coined the term "coined the term", coined the term "coined the term"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 19 points 5 months ago

Will Will Smith smith? Will Smith will smith.

[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

star wars star wars, cool cool cool. you understand.

[–] tigolbitties@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Buffalo buffalo buffalo, etc

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

...for any natural number of repetitions of "buffalo", no less.

[–] lowered_lifted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

a good way to teach both a weird case in English and a common algorithm in information science at the same time, if one wanted to do that in a STEAM course

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Underwaterbob@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

All of the faith that he had had had had no effect on the outcome of his life.

[–] slampisko@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (4 children)

James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher.

[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] slampisko@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

It's much more parseable with punctuation:

James, while John had had "had", had had "had had". "Had had" had had a better effect on the teacher.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] match@pawb.social 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

oh, i miss word avalanches

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 11 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Wouldn't the sentence 'I want to put a hyphen between the words Fish and And and And and Chips in my Fish-and-Chips sign' have been clearer if quotation marks had been placed before Fish, and between Fish and and, and and and And, and And and and, and and and And, and And and and, and and and Chips, as well as after Chips?

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago
[–] owsei@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I've read and so many times now it doesn't look like a word anymore

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 1 points 5 months ago

"And, per se, and"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lemmie689@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 5 months ago

this could use some punctuation marks but its funny anyway if not a bit redundant

[–] lenuup@reddthat.com 4 points 5 months ago

Whoever ate a sandwich ate a sandwich.

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 months ago

My single, "My single is dropping," is dropping.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

must had deep pockets

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher

[–] HakunaHafada@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago

Logic checks out.

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 months ago

Up date update: date up date

load more comments
view more: next ›