this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
1042 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

72266 readers
2372 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Worth noting buying a second hand phone is still better in every aspect and sadly 2nd hand Samsung from 3 years ago is still better and cheaper. Though Fairphone is getting closer with each release!

[–] gamer@lemm.ee 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

2nd hand Samsung from 3 years ago is still better and cheaper.

Cheaper? Yes. Better? Hell no, unless you can root it and install a custom ROM.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (4 children)

You can - Samsung phones are really well supported for that.

[–] velanox@feddit.org 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I would never go with Samsung as a conscious choice for custom ROMs, mostly because all well-supported devices are pretty old, which means lower chance of getting something in a decent state for a reasonable price used, that wouldn't require immediately swapping the battery already. Not to mention the Knox eFuse which means losing functionality when flashing a custom ROM. I'd argue a used Pixel is a better option, the 7 Pro can be had for relatively little money and is still a good phone.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bvoigtlaender@feddit.org 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Was really hoping to see a Fairphone 6a. Similar to the Google Pixel Series. Just a cheap version of it. I really don't need 120Hz, OLED or "No Bezels" all i want is big battery and a headphone jack that is all.

tbh 600$ is a series pricing.

[–] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

For real, though, what is it?

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago

A time of flight sensor for autofocus

[–] carrylex@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (6 children)

Compared to the Fairphone 5 it has some improvements but also a few downsides:

Pro:

  • It's a bit smaller (~4mm) and lighter (~20g)
  • Slightly better camera (future tests will tell how much better)
  • 120 Hz display
  • More RAM and storage (although I feel that the previous 6GB/128GB option was also sufficient for most users)
  • WiFi 6E Tri-Band (however you will likely never need this speed)
  • Bluetooth 5.4
  • Slightly larger battery

Con:

  • Backpanel now requires a screwdriver
  • Display has less resolution/PPI
  • Performance of processor will likely be nearly identical to predecessor (however it's more efficient and modern)
  • Downgrade to USB 2
  • 600€

My conclusion: Overall the improvements are ok, however just releasing the Fairphone 5 with a newer SoC might have been the better/more cost effective choice. Sacrificing display resolution for 120 Hz feels also quite wrong. 600€ is very pricy for a phone like this. Cutting some premium features away like the 120 Hz display or a bit of RAM and storage (that you can extend anyway with an SD card) might have saved enough to get the launch price down to somewhere near 500€ which would make it accessible for a wider audience.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 6 days ago

Downgrade to USB 2

What the fuck?

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (4 children)

USB 2? What a stupid choice that appears to be. Did they have any reasoning behind that?

[–] localhost443@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

The transfer speed over USB on mine probably doesn't even pass USB 2 speeds anyway and I've had flagship phones in the past that were even slower over a cable. I guess if that's still the case then there's probably a good engineering argument to reduce complexity.

[–] carrylex@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I just checked my phone and the up/down speed for files is roughly 40MB/s despite having a USB 3 connection.

USB 2 has a max. transfer rate (under optimal conditions) of 60MB/s, so I think when the phone storage improves a bit or the cable is a bit longer it will likely become a bottleneck.

Also note that there are other applications than transfering files which might need more bandwidth.

To be fair it really doesn't make much of a difference but USB 3 is now the standard for a century and has been around since 2008 so I somewhere expect a 600€ phone to also have it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] carrylex@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Why does The Fairphone (Gen. 6) use USB-2?

In order to make the device more affordable, we explored how we could best balance our spec choices with the least possible impact on user experience. Going from USB-3 to USB-2 was one of them.

https://support.fairphone.com/hc/en-us/articles/24463093338898-The-Fairphone-Gen-6-FAQ

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Thanks for the link. I can't necessarily agree that it's low impact, transferring files at 2.0 speeds is brutal.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kungen@feddit.nu 6 points 6 days ago

The extra RAM and storage probably increased the price much more than the screen upgrade.

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Regarding resolution, I've been using my S21 Ultra at FHD quality (2400x1080) since I got it and it has a significantly large screen. I don't see a point in higher resolutions but I definitely appreciate higher refresh rates. Makes it feel smoother and more responsive.

[–] carrylex@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I also found out a few other things that have changed:

  • They now use Torx T5 screws
  • The backcover and battery are now fixed with these screws
  • The battery uses a dedicated connector
  • Parts of the backcover now require a pick
  • SIM/SD now sit at the bottom in a dedicated slot and don't require the removal of the backcover.
  • The volume buttons got replaced by the "moments" button and are now on the left

IMHO this is kind of a downgrade in repairability as you now need custom tools (not everyone has a T5 screwdriver at home). Moving the volume buttons to the other side is also kind of weird and unexpected as most (non Apple) phones have them on the right...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish 14 points 6 days ago

a few things i like:

  • moments is an interesting concept
  • it says you can toggle off gemini ai. this is good
  • display goes from 10-120hz for battery
  • ultrawide selfie camera
  • microsd card slot!
  • power button fingerprint scanner, way better than underscreen
[–] bonus_crab@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (2 children)

love fairphone but i cant go bacl from graphene os. its so nice not having google attacjed to everything.

[–] localhost443@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I wish I could ditch stock android but my business bank app refuses to run on e/os and I assume I'd have the same problem with graphene.

e/os was otherwise soo much better, and the increase in performance and battery life was huge.

[–] Undearius@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago

I assume I'd have the same problem with graphene.

There's a list of bank apps that work in Grapheme. You can check for yours here

https://privsec.dev/posts/android/banking-applications-compatibility-with-grapheneos/

[–] yistdaj@pawb.social 4 points 6 days ago

If you want something not Google, I used to have Ubuntu Touch on a Fairphone before Australia's 3G network was switched off. It would have to be an older Fairphone however.

No headphone jack means I won't even consider it, very sad to see it's still the case.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

Honestly, this might be the first fairphone which I would classify as good enough for daily use.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

OTG compatible is a rare feature, I have an endoscope camera that uses OTG, but not a compatible phone.

Also, no mention of a headphone jack.

load more comments
view more: next ›