this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
232 points (99.6% liked)

News

39665 readers
2652 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Caroline Ellison has been sentenced to two years in jail for her role in the collapse of the cryptocurrency exchange FTX, which has been described as one of biggest financial frauds in US history.

Ellison was a top executive at the firm and is also the ex-girlfriend of its founder, Sam Bankman-Fried, who was sentenced to 25 years in prison for stealing $8bn (£6.3bn) from customers.

As part of a plea deal, Ellison admitted charges including wire fraud and money laundering, and testified against Bankman-Fried.

all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jaderick@lemmy.world 51 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Coincidentally I just finished the Behind the Bastards update episode on the Bankman-Fried case from back in 2023. Apparently her diary was leaked by Sam to the press in an attempt to discredit her testimony which backfired on him lmao.

Good to see her also receive consequences.

[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

if you haven't seen it yet Coffeezilla on yt has made good videos on it and even went to the courtroom to watch it in person

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 30 points 2 years ago (1 children)

She commited the ultimate crime: stealing from rich people

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 years ago

she was stealing from cryptobros which is pretty funny and morally neutral, because cryptobros don't deserve having money

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wasn't this lady also playing the role of fucktoy for him? Those two going at it doesn't conjure a positive mental image.

[–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 45 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Worse, on her blog she conceived of herself as the chief consort in his harem in between sharing her thoughts on race science and Harry Potter house sorting quizzes.

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I can forgive stealing billions, but I draw the line at being a Harry Potter adult.

[–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

What's the harm in a little bit of Arson, Murder, and Jaywalking?

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If I say that's weird will someone from hexbear appear to tell me I'm kink shaming?

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nah it’s weird. Like it’s fine if the first part is your kink. It’s not even super rare, but firstly him? Secondly the race science. Thirdly, fuck y’all are bad at poly, like worse at poly than the people constantly talking about poly.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Thirdly, fuck y’all are bad at poly, like worse at poly than the people constantly talking about poly.

You are not kidding. I nearly forgot about this story and the absolutely gross and unethical sexual practice at work here. From the article linked earlier:

“None of this non-hierarchical bullshit,” the account elaborated. “Everyone should have a ranking of their partners, people should know where they fall on the ranking, and there should be vicious power struggles for the ranks.”

For those following along: if you browse the existing literature on poly practice, this uncompassionate practice doesn't show up anywhere. These animals were using the "poly" term as a fig-leaf for their Lord of the Flies inspired, libertine, thunderdome-style non-monogamy. I'd even hesitate to call it a cult, only because it just seems so incredibly unstable as a concept. These are the people your polycule will warn you about.

No wonder these people fleeced others for billions. There's having a skewed moral compass, and then there's having a huge vacuum where a conscience and empathy should be.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

“None of this non-hierarchical bullshit,” the account elaborated. “Everyone should have a ranking of their partners, people should know where they fall on the ranking, and there should be vicious power struggles for the ranks.”

So polyamory, but fascist

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Yeah I’ve been practicing hierarchical poly for years, all of my current relationships began polyamorous. Hierarchical relationships are fine, it’s far more of a “her and I are on the ‘move in and marry’ path, and you have a husband and kids, our relationship is obviously the less important for both of us” type deal. Ranked competitive nonmonogamy is fucking insane. Like, it seems like an amazing way to make yourself absolutely fucking miserable and to deny yourself the comforts of love while pretending to be pursuing more of it.

I really can’t grasp how someone decides to do this

[–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Nah, as near as I can tell that group is vigorously in favor of suspending all human rights for capitalists, so regardless of their views on kink I think they'd be inclined to let the comment slide.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The picture of her, wow. She's only 30 and the pictures of her before the trial are much more inline with a 20 something. She's going to look like a 60 year old when she's done doing her time.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How does she look both 12 and 50?

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Headline rewrite because I had to read it 5 times to understand it:

Caroline Ellison, who then helped now ~~convited~~ convicted Sam Bankman-Fried in his FTX crypto fraud, is herself convicted and sentenced to two years for fraud

edit: fixed spelling thanks @shutz@lemmy.ca

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

but she also spilled beans on SBF, that's why she's got only 2 years and not 25 like SBF despite being equally deep in the fraud

[–] Neon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Not equally deep:

Her sentence was lower because she 1. regretted it and 2. didn't profit from the fraud according to the judge

[–] ansiz@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

"She was also ordered to forfeit more than $11bn (£8.2bn) to the court."

That sounds like profit to me. It was the cooperation with the court that really did it.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago

on top of these 11 billion dollars recovered, meaning that these were stolen, she also lived rent free in whatever bahamas mansion was bought with sbf's money, with all their ranked competitive polycule roommates

it's 100% cooperation with the court that cut down sentence that hard

[–] shutz@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Reread your attempt again.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Saw the spelling mistake, thanks! It is now even more clear that she wasn't sentenced to fraud because she helped convict Sam Bankman-Fried, but because of her own actions in committing fraud at the same time.

I think you may have misunderstood the headline.

It's not supposed to be "now convicted". She helped the lawyers make a case against SBF. She helped in the process of convicting him. She helped convict him. It's true that she did also help him do the naughty things but that's not what this headline is saying.

Your version of the headline does not convey this aspect.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Well I know what prison gang her eugenicist ass is pledging

[–] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

She reminds me of Janet Fist, vigilante receptionist