this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
560 points (91.4% liked)

memes

15369 readers
4309 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JackFrostNCola@aussie.zone 1 points 6 minutes ago

Tut tut, all these maths books promoting unhealthy square shapes, real squares have curves.

[–] CaptainBlagbird@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

Thanks, I hate it.

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 64 points 8 hours ago

The interior angles need to be equal 🤓

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 50 points 8 hours ago (6 children)

Does no one understand this is a joke, talking about parallel lines and mathematical proofs is pointless when its a fucking meme

[–] dontbelievethis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 33 minutes ago (1 children)

It's not pointless because you can laugh about a joke and then learn something about math.

They don't cancel each other out. They can be at the same place and still work on their own.

[–] weird@sub.wetshaving.social 3 points 31 minutes ago

I love memes that are funny on their own, but also provide discussion material.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 22 minutes ago

You're having fun wrong!!1one

Or the fun part.

[–] the_trash_man@lemmy.world 21 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Its wrong though so the joke falls flat

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't realize jokes have to be literally correct

[–] el_abuelo@programming.dev 4 points 2 hours ago

Just the good ones.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

We do understand it's a meme and a joke. Just not a very good one, because one can easily poke holes into it.

[–] daddycool@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Just not a very good one, because one can easily poke holes into it.

That's not how jokes work.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] daddycool@lemmy.world 0 points 42 minutes ago* (last edited 32 minutes ago) (1 children)

No, it depends on if you have humor. Yes, humor is individual, I know. But people without tend to over analyze and try to pick the joke apart, often missing the point.

A joke doesn't have to pass every technicality. You thinking it's bad if it doesn't, only applies to your humor (or lack there of).

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 38 minutes ago (1 children)

Ooh, watch out, the humor police is here! Everything the deem funny is humor and if you don't find funny what they do you don't even have humor! Wee-ooo wee-ooo!

[–] daddycool@lemmy.world 1 points 28 minutes ago (1 children)

I can be presented with a bad joke without the urge to pick it apart. You couldn't. Just saying.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 23 minutes ago* (last edited 22 minutes ago) (1 children)

And you cannot take criticism. Just saying.

(Also, I'm not picking apart the joke, I'm explaining why some people do.)

[–] daddycool@lemmy.world 1 points 12 minutes ago (1 children)

And you cannot take criticism.

What criticism?

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 7 minutes ago

The joke being critiziced.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

These are parallel too. They just look that way because they are project on to the euclidean plain.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 34 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

A square must also have two pairs of parallel sides.

[–] semperverus@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

Calculus can find you two pairs of parallel sides, right there on the circle!

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

No it doesn't. Right angles + equal length is a sufficient condition

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 hours ago

No, it isn't. A square is a plain, convex and regular quadrilateral with four internal right angles.

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 31 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

I get downvoted for bringing it up, but for fuck's sake you're dumping literally everything into this community regardless of the fit. There are a dozen (I'm estimating) other communities that could benefit from the content you post but you have thus far insisted on only posting here.

Can you at least make the tiniest effort to spread content to other communities that would benefit from the increased views and potential subscriptions?

I shall await the fun police and everything's a meme comments.

[–] weird@sub.wetshaving.social 3 points 6 hours ago

I'm sure there are more than a dozen and you are right. I'm still trying to get the hang of the whole fediverse thing, but so far most of the more niche communities I have tried to interact with are on different servers not federating with each other? Or maybe I'm doing something wrong? Not sure about that one. Also not sure if cross-posting works. I mean I know it works, but do those posts federate correctly? Can other fediverse apps see them correctly?

[–] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemm.ee 18 points 10 hours ago

At least it's better than endless American politics.

[–] ChillCapybara@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 9 hours ago

Thank you for calling it out. Had a look at post history and I agree, blocked. Lemmy is attracting all sorts of random noise lately.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 101 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Someone never had to deal with mathematical proofs, only layman's definitions.

All properties of a parallelogram apply:

  • Opposite sides are parallel
  • Opposite sides are congruent
  • Opposite angles are congruent
  • Consecutive angles are supplementary
  • Diagonals bisect each other

AND

  • All angles are congruent
  • All sides are congruent
  • Diagonals are congruent
  • Diagonals are perpendicular
  • Diagonals bisect opposite angles
[–] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

Of course, but such strict definitions only come about because smart people come up with examples like OP when you don’t add the full definition.

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 126 points 14 hours ago (6 children)

Straight lines. Also two sets of parallel lines. This is one definition of a square, but not the common one.

[–] mcqtom@lemmy.world 38 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

I believe these lines are straight with a black hole at the centre.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 24 points 13 hours ago

straight, gay, lines are lines. let them be.

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

If that's so, the angles are probably not right angles.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 5 points 13 hours ago

None of the angles looks wrong either

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DeusUmbra@lemmy.world 14 points 11 hours ago

Dammit Diogenes, this is why we don't allow you in the geometry class anymore.

[–] jim3692@discuss.online 16 points 12 hours ago

Solution:

Explanation:

  1. in order for the straight lines to be 90 deg with the circles, they must be radii of circles with same central point

  2. the length of an arc is defined as c = r * θ (where r is the radius, and θ is the angle)

  3. we define the inner circle with radius r₁ and its arc L₁ = r₁ * θ₁

  4. we define the outer circle with radius r₂ and its arc L₂ = r₂ * θ₂

  5. Because of (1), θ₁ + θ₂ = 2π

  6. To create the shape, L₁ = L₂ = r₂ - r₁

If you start replacing and solving, you will get a 2nd grade quadratic, which has a positive and a negative solution. The positive solution is that magic number.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 29 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

If it clucks likes a chicken and scratches like a chicken, it's Man.

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I got that reference!Behold, a featherless biped!

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago

And for those who don't: Plato, a Greek philosopher, was putatively asked by a student while teaching at the Academy what the definition of a man (human) was. Plato responded that a man is a "featherless biped".

Diogenes, another Greek philosopher and infamous quick-wit, caught wind of this and thought that was the dumbest thing ever, so he gate-crashed one of Plato's lectures and pulled out a chicken which had all of its feathers plucked out and said "Behold, a man!".

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 20 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Learned this one in 6th grade geometry: drawing a square in thr corner doesn't make it 90°

[–] Mr_Fish@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago

But these are all right angles, as long as the two arcs are centered on the same point as the intersection of the two straight lines.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›