How do passkeys keep you inside Google’s walled garden?
this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
55 points (89.9% liked)
Privacy
2596 readers
135 users here now
Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.
Rules
PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!
- Be civil and no prejudice
- Don't promote big-tech software
- No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
- No reposting of news that was already posted
- No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
- No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)
Related communities:
Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.
- !opensource@programming.dev
- !selfhosting@slrpnk.net / !selfhosted@lemmy.world
- !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !drm@lemmy.dbzer0.com
founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
They also push google oauth. If you're logging in to over a dozen sites with your google account, it becomes that much harder or at least more annoying to curate all of those. They're banking on people choosing convenience over security - and they'll be right.
With passkeys you no longer need to use oauth at all since creating and using passkeys can be done more easily than creating a new password or using oauth. If you’re using Google services of course you’ll still log in with a Google account, but on example.com you can just create a new account with a passkey and never worry about oauth or passwords at all.
They don’t, well, not any more than passwords do.
In lack of further context, and thus conjecturing, maybe as a leash/ransom? "If you walk out of our (Google's) line, we will kill potentially decades of your history".
I think OP and several others in this thread just don’t understand what passkeys are replacing, which is passwords. Google doesn’t manage any part of that.
more like the garden of weeds is spreading out of control. they want passkeys and oauth so they can become the third-party gatekeeper for everything.
the want them tied to bio because your fingertip or face are harder to share with others, harder to fake, easier to track multiple accounts with, and are tied to real people and identities that can be linked with other data their databases all to make their data and targeted adverts more profitable.
Passkeys have nothing to do with Google. They’re a standard compliant control mechanism designed to replace passwords. https://fidoalliance.org/passkeys/
Google doesn’t do anything with them besides store them exactly like they would your password. You authenticate using your device, which Google knows nothing about. The biometrics do not leave your device. https://www.passkeycentral.org/introduction-to-passkeys/passkey-security
Passkeys do not have to be biometric. You can use 1Password for example and not ever use fingerprints or anything biometric and still use passkeys to log in to services. It’s literally just a different better authentication method than passwords. You can still share passkeys through a password manager.
Literally everything you said is scaremongering and making it easier for scammers to take advantage of people. You should be switching to passkeys immediately.
It's bad but at least it's something actually secure, unlike PayPal that dropped passwords in favor of a TOTP sent by SMS.
I can use my yubikey with PayPal. Although it's only 1 key allowed at a time. Still some progress
I love how companies like PayPal claim to need your phone number "for your security," and then you find out they do insecure things like this
Passkeys are actually superior to passwords from a security standpoint though.
I believe the passkey system doesn't mandate you use Google to hold the key FWIW, I think apple has a compatible system you can keep the key in for iPhones and I believe you can use something like a yubikey for them too
API docs: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Web_Authentication_API
But passkeys are NOT MFA. They essentially replace "what you know" with "what you have". Adding a second passkey like a yubikey only furthers the single factor. Also courts have ruled that you can be compelled to provide biometric data to unlock your accounts.
I suspect Google is moving to replace passwords not out of the kindness of their hearts but to allow the government to get into your account.
My preferred MFA combination is yubikey (or similar physical key) + Password/PIN.
You don’t have to use biometrics to authenticate your passkeys.
I tried enabling a passkey on one of my Google accounts but couldn't wrap my brain around it. It felt like if I lost my phone I'd be screwed.
Think of a passkey as a specific "device" getting access to a service.
Device is in quotes here since it's really tied to the browser and your session on that browser so if you use multiple accounts or you use incognito mode, you will create a new passkey with each session.
You set up a passkey on each "device" you are using Google and then manage those keys through Google's account security web site, deleting keys as needed.
I'm personally not a fan of passkeys as a replacement for passwords. They provide a second factor but should not be relied upon as the only factor for authentication.
Use a password manager and you'll only have to set it once. And prevents you from getting screwed by lost devices.
Yes, passkeys are more secure but if and when Google is involved, then hell to the fuck no. I'm already moving away from Google anyway, Gmail amongst a few others, are still left.
passkeys are way for your a token unlocked by your device’s biometric sensor to validate a request. biometric information is not sent to Google.
The standard is implemented by multiple vendors, Just like HTTP Basic Auth is. It is not Google specific
You don’t have to use biometrics either. You can just use a password manager that manages the passkeys and only login to the pw manager with a pw.