this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
319 points (98.8% liked)

News

35962 readers
2864 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 76 points 1 year ago

The cult of the CEO must end.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Around the country, collective action is in a resurgence. I saw striking aircraft workers today. I believe it was Beech, but I’m visiting family and can’t say for sure as Wichita KS is a manufacturing hub.

[–] TammyTobacco@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Wichita is Spirit, the company that makes the plane bodies for Boeing. That's most likely part of the Boeing strike

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What if we just made all the workers into CEOs?

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like the workers owned and operated the business? Their hard work would be rewarded with profit sharing? That would actually mean I'd have to care about the shareholders.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 17 points 1 year ago

But what if those workers owned the business too? Like what if it was beholden to the same kind of person who goes to work every day like the people who worked there?

What a world that would be.

[–] lkdm@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Let the age of microcorporations begin

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That doesn’t work. You need a decision maker.

It’s not a terribly difficult job so they don’t need to get paid more than anyone else, but executive action by committee doesn’t work.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

executive action by committee doesn’t work.

Is there actually any evidence for that? Isn't that basically what they have in Switzerland? And they are one of the absolute richest countries in the world.
Above the CEO is usually a committee called the board, which govern all stock companies, and by far the most successful big companies are stock companies.

Companies run by a CEO without responsibility towards a committe (board) have much higher risk of doing something incredibly stupid that ruin the company. And can't be removed no matter how incredibly stupid and harmful they are to the company.
For example as we see with Elon Musk and Twitter. Donald Trump and his Casinos. Pillow guy. Michael Dell.
Funny enough also Steve Jobs at first, but then taken in to rescue Apple successfully later.

[–] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are muddling two different concepts in your Switzerland argument. You are probably referring to the fact, that Switzerland has a direct democracy for certain political decisions in addition to having a parliament. But that is not why it's a rich country. That's because of their big companies who are by no means anything else but die hard capitalistic and self serving. You might know some of them for their evil deeds, for example Nestlé.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'd argue that a democracy is governing by committe on the biggest scale we have, namely a whole country. This is in contrast to dictatorships.
Are you arguing that dictatorship is better at governing than a democracy?
Switzerland is going by the biggest committee there is more than most, and is hugely successful.

[–] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

... Please read my original comment again carefully. I said nowhere that a dictatorship is better at governing. I said that Switzerland is rich because of their companies being capitalistic assholes that would or better ARE right now fucking up the planet and the rest of humanity. You can read on Wikipedia about Nestle, the Nazi gold and tax haven, the Russian influence, etc. That is how Switzerland got really rich, not due to their direct democracy (which I find awesome).

You could argue that there is a small connection between both, since the neutrality of Switzerland was part of why so many companies and banks managed to get big.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

You say Switzerland is rich because of Nestle, OK how much tax does Nestle pay in Switzerland? And how much is that of the total.
I didn't respond to your Nestle argument, because it's silly.
7 of the 10 richest companies in the world are American, so how exactly is Switzerland rich because of 1 company that is ranked 96 on fortune 500?

https://fortune.com/ranking/global500/2024/search/

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Executive by committee is different than a board that gets together regularly. The board usually gives the ceo direction.

It’s also why most countries have both a committee and an executive instead of just a committee.

In the case of Elon he usually makes shareholders lots of money. Sure he tanked Twitter but that was after they got paid.

[–] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope one day I can see labor universally organized. I sadly don’t think I will, but that’s the dream