this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
267 points (90.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

11973 readers
1090 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This was a Critical Mass event, which is why the bicyclists are taking up all of the street as a way to reclaim the streets and protest the lack of safety for riders under usual conditions. It's not legal, but protests are never useful if they're fully legal now, are they.

(page 2) 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 44 points 15 hours ago

"Everyone except me is crazy."

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 35 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

She definitely should have either stopped or gone a different route, but it is incredibly dangerous to cycle head onto incoming motor traffic. Not really a great look for the cyclists.

Better off staying in the correct lane but hogging it so vehicles had no choice but to stay behind.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It's functionally identical. The lane is occupied. Motorists cannot enter it, whether the cyclists are facing them or not.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Monstrosity@lemm.ee 17 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

ITT: confounded folks who live in areas where Critical Mass events don't take place.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world -1 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

ITT people not understanding that new and confusing situations are confusing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 23 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

While she is clearly a dumbass for not just parking and waiting, why is the bike ride taking up all of the lanes in both directions? Was the street blocked off and this lady ignored it?

Why was there an oncoming car in her lane?

This really needs context.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 33 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The OP has some context but Lemmy is bad about showing the text included with a media post so it's easy to miss. The OP states it's a "critical mass" protest where large numbers of cyclists reclaim the street to demand better bicycle infrastructure

[–] destructdisc@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago

I figured that was happening, which is why I updated the title to explicitly state it's a Critical Mass event

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

I have no official context. If I had to guess this was some kind of organized night bike event. There were multiple cars on the road so likely not a closed course thing, probably organized only on social media. The car on the wrong side of the road was probably trying to go around the cyclists. The cyclist were likely in the wrong, but as a driver she definitely should have turned off of that street and gone around.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Not sure how she could turn off and go around when she has no idea why there is a massive amount of bikes, where they are coming from, or where they are going. Going around requires more information than someone surprised by a massive number of surprise bikes would have.

I'm not opposed to the idea, and I do think just stopping and waiting it out is the best option. She was wrong to just drive forward through the crowd of bikes, but maybe she hoped she would get past the mass of bikes faster?

But expecting someone to 'just go around' is pretty dismissive of someone's confusion when completely surrounded in a situation they don't understand. Like what if she just needed to turn left and go two blocks?

[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty easy to just turn the keys and wait... What they did is risking injuring someone. And if you want to take the selfish route, she's putting herself at risk of a large group of now angry people. Turn off the multi ton vehicle and wait. It's not that hard.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Yes, stopping and waiting it out is what I said she should have done. Someone else said she should have 'just gone around'.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com -2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (3 children)

bicyclists are taking up all of the street

It’s not legal

It is absolutely legal. The driver's manual for my state:

Bicycles are considered vehicles when on roadways. Bicyclists are required and expected to follow the same rules of the road as motorized vehicles. As a motorist, you should know that a bicyclist has the same rights, privileges, and responsibilities as you. Respect for each other will aid in the smooth flow of traffic.

Unless there's a bicycle lane, bicycles get the full lane of regular streets like any other vehicle. On highways, they stay close to the right boundary. Bicycles are passed with abundant clearance.

Edit: Full street? Nevermind.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›